| THINK-ISRAEL | |||||
THINK-ISRAEL features essays
and commentaries that provide context for the continuing crisis in
Israel. We report on global anti-Semitism. The war Islam is waging
against Israel and the West is our top priority. We aim to make sense of
what's going on.
|
| NOTE: CLICK Items In The White Box Above To Go DIRECTLY To The Featured Articles And The Latest Blog-Ed Page, etc. Or scroll down until you come to the Featured Articles and Blog-Eds. |
|
This search box uses standard Google. It doesn't do partial words or
wildcard expressions or find every possibility. It does do limited
booleans using AND or OR. If a and b are searchwords:
* a AND b finds files that include both searchwords. a OR b accepts any file with either or both searchwords. * A set of searchwords separated by spaces is an AND search. A phrase in quotes is a single searchword. |
|
We are told that there is a difference between extremist Islam and
peaceloving normal Islam.
Judging by their behavior, Muslims are anti-West, anti-Democracy, anti-Christian, anti-Jewish, anti-Buddhist, and anti-Hindu. Muslims are involved in 25 of some 30 conflicts going on in the world: in Afghanistan, Algeria, Bangladesh, Bosnia, Congo, Cote d'Ivoire, Cyprus, East Timor, India, Indonesia (2 provinces), Kashmir, Kazakastan, Kosovo, Kurdistan, Macedonia, the Middle East, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Somalia, Sudan, Russia-Chechnya, Tajikistan, Thailand, Uganda and Uzbekistan. Doesn't this mean that extremist Islam is the norm and normal Islam is extremely rare? |
|
"The Palestinian people does not
exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for
continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab
unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians,
Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical
reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people,
since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a
distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism.
"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa. While as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan." (PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein, March 31, 1977, interview with the Dutch newspaper Trouw.) |
|
|
The total for all the 22 Arab League
countries is 6,145,389 square miles (SM). By comparison, all 50 states of
the United States have a total of 3,787,318 SM. Israel has
8,463 SM, about one-sixth of that of the State of Michigan.
Iran, Turkey, Pakistan and Afghanistan are Muslim but not Arab and are
not included.
World Arab population: 300 million; World Jewish population: 13.6 million; Israel's Jewish population: 5.4 million. (reference: Dr. Wilbert Simkovitz, http://dehai.org/archives/dehai_news_archive/ apr04/0223.htmldehai.org/ archives/dehai_news_archive/apr04/0223.html) |
| "It has no heart. It has no spine. Its mouth serves as its anus. It has a diffuse net of nerves instead of a brain. Is it a jelly fish or an Israeli politician? Pick one. Whichever one you picked, you were right." (Eliezar Edwards, June 20, 2005) |
| "There are Muslim moderates. Islam itself is not moderate." (Ibn Warraq, author of Why I am Not a Muslim.) |
| To Israeli Secularists: You want a normal country, like everybody else? I will tell you how. Forget ads featuring bikini-clad hotsies. Forget promoting "alternative" life styles. The secret is to adopt the right attitude. A normal country doesn't give up an inch of land that belongs to it. A normal country doesn't let its citizens go hungry while it feeds its enemy and gives them medical care. A normal country doesn't let foreigners take over its holy sites –– Hebron, the Temple Mount, Joseph's Tomb. Looking at what counts, it's the religious Jews of Samaria and Judea and the Golan that are acting normal, not you. (Eliezar Edwards, March 20, 2008) |
| "Everyone pushes a Middle East initiative. It is the last refuge of legacy-seeking secretaries of state, no matter the president or the party." (Danielle Pletka, American Enterprise Institute, March 2008) |
| "Islam is a religion. Islamism is a political ideology that uses the Koran as the basis for a theory of political activism that is hostile to Western culture and political systems." (Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, "Voice of Moderation," April 2008) |
|
White House Telephone Number: 1-202-456-1414 Every call is tallied by subject matter.
|
| FEATURED STORIES | ||||||||||||||
|
March-April, 2008
THE PALESTINIAN REFUGEE ISSUE: RHETORIC VS. REALITY
Curious, isn't it, that according to received wisdom, the attack of
the Arab States in 1967 resulted in hundreds of thousands of Arab
refugees and not a single Jewish refugee. In reality, as Sidney
Zabludoff writes, there were many more Jewish refugees -- they fled
for their lives from the Arab countries, many of them to Israel.
Despite the Arab countries crying crocodile tears for their
Palestinian brethren, the Arab refugees are still with us. And there
really are no Jewish refugees -- they have become full-fledged
citizens of Israel and the western countries to which they fled.
THE CAROB TREE IS WAITING FOR US
We know that the Jews who were expelled from their homes and farms and
orchards in Gush Katif, Gaza in August 2005 by their own government
are still in refugee status. We know they live in paper trailers and
temporary shacks. We know that they are demoralized and many are
unemployed. We know they don't have the resources to recreate the
innovative agricultural techniques that made their vegetables and
flowers world-renowned. We know that the government has probably
spent more money pretending that all is A-Ok than in resettling these
people. Nadav Shragai writes of their emotional response -- of their
longing for their old homes and the sense of community they once had.
OF CONCERTS AND CRIMINALS
Rachel Saperstein writes of the irony that the Gush Katif orchestra
gave a concert at towns that were indifferent when the Gush Katifers
were kicked out of Gaza. Now that these towns are being constantly
struck by missiles from Gaza, they sing another tune. And she writes
of a wonderful man, a rabbi who founded AMISHAV (My People Return) to
help returnees to Judaism. His grandchild was murdered in the Yeshivat
Merkaz Harav massacre "because he was a Jew.".
GLOOM, DOOM –– AND YET...
Moshe Saperstein writes - a frighteningly honest account of his
bitterness at all the phonies who contributed to the people of Gush
Katif becoming dispirited refugees in their own country. And he's none
too pleased with the gullibility of the general public, who are so
easily duped by the anti-Jewish Israeli government.. And yet, there
are the everyday chores to do, there's family, there're the cats to
worry about, and there's the dream of returning to his personal
paradise -- Gush Katif, to make it as it was before the Arabs uglified
it
TO BE OR NOT TO BE –– THIS YEARS PASSOVER QUESTION?!
Anita Tucker was a successful farmer in Gush Katif, Gaza. She was one
of the many Jews that made that desert bloom. Now she is a refugee,
made homeless by her own government. It is the Passover. And she asks:
why? why? why did this happen? It is the
Passover. She vows, with the help of caring Jews, to rebuild, and to
preserve "the community and the values we have held onto for dear life
for the sake of the People of Israel, the Land of Israel, the Torah ––
for us." What a remarkable woman!
BUSH-RICE BIRTHDAY PRESENT TO THE JEWISH NATION
The reasons given for Bush's sudden rush to establish a Palestinian
state are (1) to establish a legacy for Bush and (2) to sacrifice
Israel for Arab cooperation in extricating the U.S.A. from Iraq.
Neither makes sense -- in that it is unlikely the Palestinian Arabs
will maintain a facade of civility long enough for either to happen.
Realistically, you can't make a viable and peacable state from a bunch
of hate-filled savages eager to kill and loot, savages led by a bunch
of thugs who make a profit from promising peace while collecting the
weaponry for another try at eliminating Israel. Emanuel A. Winston
speculates on how the Bush administration proposes to start
dismantling Israel.
YOUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AT WORK ... FOR PALESTINIANS
The Arab population in Gaza, Judea and Samaria is reportedly going
hungry, with only a trickle of electricity and no clean water. Yet,
when it comes to getting foreign funding, the PLO -- and its more
recent incarnation as the P.A. and Hamas -- has been outstandingly
successful. It is funded by Arab countries, the European
Union, the United Nations, Non-Governmental Organizations, church
groups and private "charities." And -- as Anne Lieberman shows us --
the United States government.
ISRAEL'S ELECTORAL COMPLEX
In this important article, Amotz Asa-El discusses the structure of the
Israeli electoral system. He argues that because there is no direct
accountability of legislators to voters, the Israeli system
cultivates irresponsibility among lawmakers and alienates voters.
CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE SUICIDAL KIND: CRIMES AGAINST JEWISH HUMANITY
Boris Celser writes about the Israeli media and academics who protect
Israel's wrong-way politicians. As a case in point, he writes of the
Israeli newspapers that protect Israel's recycled politicians, thus
helping to perpetuate government by the incompetent and to encourage
Israel's policy of appeasement. He points out that "the game ends when
one side runs out of land" -- a real possibility given official
Israel's suicidal policy of giving up real land for paper peace. The
tone of the article is cynical but the words are sober and wise. As
Celser write, "can anyone deny that since Oslo the politics of
yesterday and today have not worked, are getting worse by the day, and
are not going to work tomorrow?" And in acceding to dememberment,
Israel harms not only herself but all of Jewish humanity.
HOW I DEFEATED ISRAEL'S DUAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Steven Plaut has the distinction of being slapped with a frivolous
libel lawsuit in an Israeli court, having the presiding Arab judge
rule against him -- she based her opinion on her own prejudices -- and
finally winning out, thus striking a blow for democratic free speech.
A harrowing experience but a blow for fairness that will benefit all
who are tried by a judiciary system that creates rules on the fly.
This is his fascinating account.
MURDEROUS MOTHERS: THE HIDDEN FEMALE FACE OF HONOR KILLING
This is the story about an honor killing. It isn't really novel that
it happened in America. It isn't even unique that it happened in the
U.S.A. and the mother helped slaughter her own daughters. But it is an
absorbing story that Phyllis Chesler tells us. As she concludes, the
victims "... were American citizens. America was their culture. Their
desire to live as Americans, and not as Arab Muslims in Egypt is
precisely what doomed them."
"SHARIA CREEP" AROUND THE WORLD
Kathy Shaidle writes about some small nibbles Sharia-activists are
taking out of our democratic structures. They're small, they push the
envelop, they encourage our universities and workplaces to be
"sensitive" to what are claimed to be Islamic requirements -- even if
every one else is discomforted. More to the point, they soften us up
-- each concession we make makes us more compliant, more likely to
agree with the next
A TALE OF TWO ARCHBISHOPS
In Great Britain, the Sharia banking system is courted by the banking
community and "sensitivity" to Muslim needs is a top priority in the
educational system. Too often, Christian national and religious
symbols are banned while Muslim "requests" are respected. Giving legal
status to sharia courts means allowing Muslim women to be treated as
chattel -- not exactly a feature of democracy. Daniel Mandel contrasts
the statements of the past and current archbishops of Canterbury to
illustrate how high the tide of sharia compliance has reached. "[The
previous Archbishop] Carey sees democracy as tender and in need of
consolidation; [the current Archbishop] Williams sees it as something
rigid and in need of modification." As Mandel points out, "the
prevalent reaction, as the events of recent years show, has been to
opt for the Williams model of modifying democracy, rather than the
Carey model of consolidating democracy, to flee the Islamist challenge
rather than confront it."
REFLECTIONS ON HAMAS JIHADI DEPRAVITY –– THE BRUTAL TRUTH
Tom Carew reflects on depravity –– as manifested, for
example, in the massacre of the eight young Mercaz HaRav Yeshiva
students –– and provides us with a useful list of the
features that characterize depravity. Unlike TV shows of
depraved criminals, it isn't just the individual Arab murderer who is
depraved but his entire culture, which finds joy in depriving others
of life. An obscene death lust has permeated all of Palestinian Arab
culture. "All those who celebrate such Depraved Crime are also morally
corrupting and gravely abusing their own children, and as such not fit
to have or retain or influence or teach any children." As front-line
people "in the struggle for humanity," Israel has an obligation to
stop the depraved behavior of their depraved neighbors ––
for all our sakes.
SHAYKH YUSUF AL-QARADAWI: PORTRAIT OF A LEADING ISLAMIST CLERIC
In his article on the Muslim Brotherhood's infiltration of the West
(January-February 2008 Issue), Fjordman described Yusuf al-Qaradawi,
spiritual leader of the Brotherhood, as one who "exploits democracy as
a Trojan horse." In this article Ana Belén Soage rounds out the
picture of Qaradawi as a prolific writer who can find Koranic
justification for whatever innovative position he wants to take. He is a
persuasive ideolog respected by Islamic theologists; yet he is a man
of action -- he is credited for creating the riots over the Danish
cartoons of Muhammed (See Danish
Cartoons.) All he wants from the West is for it to convert to a
higher truth -- Islam -- and he has the financial, theological and
people resources to put his ideas into action.
PATHWAYS TO JIHADI TERRORISM
Over the years, Dr. Babu Suseelan has explored various components of
the Jihardi Muslim value system and how Muslims conceptualize the
world. In this article he rejects the comforting but wrong notion that
jihadi terrorism is the result of "unjust social forces" -- that
terror acts are the "frustrated responses to political injustices".
Instead, he identifies the roots of Muslim terrorism: "religious,
psychological, educational, and historical factors", which evolve into
terrorism because of the faulty thinking Islam encourages. This
thinking is hard to correct because, as he points out, "Islam is a
closed dogma and Muslims are forbidden to test its validity or
utility..."
WHY A TERRORIST STRATEGY?
It's almost seven years after the Islamists declared war on us -- the
911 unprovoked attack by Muslims on American government and
financial centers -- yet most of the media are still too finicky to
call people who commit acts of terror terrorists. They describe
terrorists as militants or freedom fights and immediately find
excuses for their vile behavior. The problem with this tactic, Barry
Rubin points out, is that "[while] honest grievances can be resolved
by mutual concessions. With determined, ideologically clear,
mass-based revolutionary movements you can only defeated them or
surrender." Maybe we should start calling a terrorist a terrorist.
MERCAZ HARAV AND THE G-WORD
This is a brilliant essay -- it is as if we are allowed to examine the
essayist's thoughts as he thinks them while he engages in mental
conversation with people who objected to SPME (Scholars for Peace in
the Middle East) characterizing the murder of the young students at
the Mercaz Harav as genocidal. Richard Landes cogitates on the
massacre and makes us understand why others who object to this
characterization as too strong have missed the mark -- they don't yet
understand that the attack wasn't a random act of violence but was
part of the concerted genocidal assault by Jihadist Islam on Judaism.
MAYBE IT'S TIME TO FESS UP
Jeff Dunetz takes hold of a lively canard -- Jews own/run/control the
WORLD and -- metaphorically speaking -- beats it to a well-deserved
death. Admittedly, he has his work cut out for him, given that tenured
academics and even an ex-president have pickled, smoked, salted and
marinated this duck, preserving it in fancy lies. Next time some
stupido sounds off that the Israel Lobby sent us to make war against
Iraq or that the anti-Semitic New York Times is Israel-friendly
because its founders were Joowish, remember this essay.
BLOOD LIBEL -- PART I
We look forward to Passover but it brings with it some baggage we'd
like to think was left behind in the Dark Ages -- the Blood Libel, the
accusation that the Jews killed Christian children for blood for their
matzohs. The Jews. Of all people! A people whose religion forbids
ingesting blood! As Patricia Berlyn writes, the Libel hasn't died; it
lives on in Muslim mythology -- the Arabs have taken it up and, as
authentic modern-day medievalists, they need no evidence to propagate the
lie as literal truth. Abetted by a friendly media, they have concocted
other libels centered around the conviction that Jews target children
for killing. It seems that the more the Jews attempt to minimize loss
of Arab lives, the more grotesque the lies the Arabs invent.
A PASSOVER STORY FOR ISRAEL TODAY
Using as parable a tale about a Pesach guest too impatient to wait
past the symbolic seder food for the later feast, Steven Plaut makes
an important point: Israel had just about defeated the first Arab
intifada and there was little sympathy for PLO barbarism, when, in the
early 1990s, the Israeli leadership was foolish enough to step onto
the slippery slope of the Oslo "Peace" Accords. This commitment has
not led to peace or even to an increase of tranquillity. Can we "The
Oslo era was accompanied by a massive assault upon Israel's pride,
morale and confidence by its own leaders and intellectual elites." Is
it too late to bring back "an understanding of Jewish heritage" and
the pre-Oslo achievements?
WHO DID WHAT FOR ISRAEL IN 1948?
It is appropriate as we celebrate Israel's 60th to examine some of the
received wisdom about those days. Norman Berdichevsky demolishes the
myth that the USA was Israel's only friend and made Jewish statehood
possible, supplying "money, manpower and arms". While the U.S.A voted
for partition, it was primarily Czech arms, East European and Soviet
manpower and East Bloc political support that enabled Israel to
decisively win the military and diplomatic battles. If you think this
reads like the novel 1984 -- with flip flopping alliances --
you may be right.
THE 60-YEAR WAR FOR ISRAEL'S HISTORY
One sometimes wonders if Israel needs her Arab enemies -- her internal
haters do such a good job denegrating Israel's accomplishments,
rewriting her history and denying her right to exist as a Jewish
state. Efraim Karsh writes of the "new historians ... who
systematically rewrote the history of Zionism, warping the saga for
Israel's survival." They didn't just reevaluate the facts; in many
cases, they invented them or distorted their meaning by omitting key
information. Unfortunately, though their tactics have been exposed,
the new historians are not yet history.
LIES BEGGING TO BE EXPOSED
Evelyn Gordon identifies one element in Israel's poor public relations
-- "Israel's persistent failure to refute Palestinian lies." As
example, a recent poll was misinterpreted as proof that the
Palestinian arabs shows increased support for violence because of the
Israeli offensive in Gaza. "Far from being unprecedented, however,
that figure is almost identical to what it was 18 months ago..." But
the Arab lies are not refuted and so they stand, unchallenged. As
Gordon points out, "It would be nice if journalists, world leaders and
international human rights organizations consistently noticed such
lies on their own, but the reality is that they rarely have the time,
energy or interest to do the necessary research. For Israel, however,
exposing Palestinian lies is a vital interest." But, thanks to her
defeatist Government, Israel doesn't.
HOW ISRAEL GOT TRASHED
Isi Leibler notes that the change from passionately repudiating Arab
falsehoods to diffidence and appeasement came with the Oslo Accords.
Diplomats were directed to plead the Arab case, not their own. Many of
Israel's newspapers followed suit. One reader pointed out that
"[c]oncepts like eternal refugees, blatant revisionism and even the
concept of 'Palestine' are symptoms of the denial of reality." Yet
these became constant staples in the diet Israeli newspapers such as
Haaretz have fed their readers. "Haaretz effectively
provided the mainstream Western media with a kosher certification to
incorporate the most extreme anti-Israeli content. 'If Israeli papers
can publish this, why should we be less inhibited?' became the
standard response of numerous editors when accused of anti-Israeli
bias and double standards."
FORGING A MODERN VIABLE ECONOMIC UNION IN THE MIDDLE EAST
This is an unusual offering -- Jaff Sassanian is the nom de
plume of a spokesman for the Sassanians who live in Iran. His
essay is a reminder that it isn't just Jews that dislike the notion of
living as second-class citizens under Islam. The Sassanians are an
ancient people who were conquered by the Arabs. Like the Jews they
have held onto their culture and traditions. Read what Jaff Sassanian
has to say. If he's right, perhaps the debate about going into Iran or
not isn't the issue. Perhaps we should be giving more support to
Iranian dissidents. If -- of course -- if there's enough time and the
Iranian leaders haven't jumped ahead in developing their nuclear power
while our "intelligence" services lulled us into complacency.
THE GOLAN HEIGHTS PEACE PLAN
Moshe Feiglin takes what happened in the Golan in the Yom Kippur War
as a model for how to acheive peace in the Territories -- Gaza,
Samaria and Judea. There are five essential elements: 1. Encourage
Arab emigration; 2. Conquest; 3. Israeli sovereignty; 4. Settlement;
and 5. No peace accords! He writes, "Israel declared sovereignty over
the entire Golan, settled it and most important of all -- never signed
a peace treaty with Syria. This is how we have prevented the war under
the guise of peace that we suffer on our border with Egypt from
repeating itself on our border with Syria." It's hard to argue with
success, particularly when every concession for negotiated "peace"
with the Arabs has led to a weakened Israel and a more hostile Arab
response.
READERS' BLOG-EDS This is where our readers get a chance to write opinions and editorials and share articles they find informative. The Blog-Eds page for the month is updated every few days. A Blog-Ed page has a quick list of the articles from which you can access any of the articles immediately. To go to the list, click the "Blog-Eds List" box in the Blue Strip on the top of the Blog-Ed page. March 2008 BLOG-EDS
READ MORE
| ||||||||||||||
January-February, 2008
MEMO FROM GULFISTAN
Martin Kramer provides us with a realistic assessment of where the
Peace Process stands. Bottom Line: it's out of steam. Posturing maybe,
but no real pressure. And even among themselves, the Arabs are not
doing kissy-kiss and make-up. Saudi Arabia may from time to time
support both Sunni and Shiites, but there's no united front against
Iran. What is puzzling then: what –– or who –– is fueling Olmert's
monomania to destroy the Jewish communities of Samaria and Judea?
WINOGKATIF
David Wilder puts the current appeasement of the Arabs in historic
context, pointing out that Israel's first crumbling was after the 1967
Six Day War, when in their hunger for peace with their Arab neighbors,
Israel acted as if it were the defeated side and destroyed Jewish
settlements that had been started in the Sinai. The attitude that
Israel must make all the concessions for peace plus a Marxist
educational system that teaches the lie that Israel really doesn't
belong to the Jews plus an IDF that is taught it isn't nice to win
have all contributed to the parlous state in which Israel now finds
itself. It is an excellent summary not only of what is going on in
Israel but it points out: "the aim of Islam is not only the end of
Israel; rather it is the Islamization of the entire western world and
culture, including a takeover of Europe and North America."
ON THE PRESENT DANGER FACING ISRAEL AND ALL JEWS
Rachel Neuwirth does a masterful job summerizing the dangers Jews face
around the world. Terorism, particularly in Israel, has not abated
since the 1993 Oslo Accords; instead it has increased and the
terrorists are stronger than ever. Terrorism against Jews in the
diaspora is still minimal –– which means this is the time
to stop it –– but the FBI refuses to connect the dots. The
diplomats find it more rewarding to pressure Israel, which has been
willing to make concessions, that to deal with the Arabs, who won't
budge from their position. The propaganda attacks against the Jews
continue. And what really drains our strength is that "[t]housands of
Jewish journalists, academics, filmmakers, artists and 'intellectuals'
in the United States, Canada, Europe, and within Israel itself have
actively participated in the campaign of vilification and lies against
Israel. Neuwirth's essay is not happiness-making. But it is impossible
to improve a situation until you understand it.
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND GAZA: THE ASSAULT ON ISRAEL'S RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE
One of the Dr. Seuss books chronicles the ever more disasterous
results of trying to correct what started as a single stupid mistake.
As analog, we have Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in the mistaken
belief that Israel could thus separate itself from the nasties who
live in the Territories. The Government has been generally indifferent
to its own displaced Gazan Jews, a demoralized group of once proud and
productive citizens. But their plight has received little attention.
On the other hand Israel is held responsible for the welfare of the
Gazan Arabs, and there is much media indignation if she cuts back on
services. The new owners of Gaza are too busy to worry about their own
infrastructure –– they are occupied making bombs and
distributing them for free to as many Israeli cities as they can
reach. They've also mucked up the water supply and –– now
that they've broken the barrier with Egypt –– are bringing
diseased animals in from Egypt. As Israel tries to deal with the
worsening situation in Gaza, the pro-Arab press has taken up a new
version of an old mantra: it's all Israel's fault. Abraham Bell
explains the legality of what Israel is doing. I wonder if it will
have any impact on those who want Israel dead.
PALESTINIAN CONDITIONAL NON-VIOLENCE –– DENYING THE FUNDAMENTAL BASIS OF THE GAME
America trains Arab terrorists to fight; Israel gives them guns and
Abbas smiles –– all of them, it is claimed, are determined
to defeat Hamas and establish a peaceful Palestinian state inside
Israel. The reality: Abbas turns over the weaponry to Hamas, sometimes
willingly; Israel releases prisoners who return to killing Jews; and
Abbas announces that peace with Israel is not really what he is after.
Extermination is a closer fit to his plans. Dr. Aaron Lerner
succinctly summarizes Abbas' actual plans, not the misty nonsense
American and Israeli politicians spout. The article includes some
direct quotes from Abbas' latest interview from the PMW website. The
reality is: (1) we help Abbas and he gets strong, then joins Hamas to
fight Israel openly; or (2) we don't help Abbas and in high dudgeon he
joins Hamas to fight Israel openly. Why is Israel waiting while its
enemies gather strength?
FATAH AS MODERATE. A HARD LOOK POST-ANNAPOLIS
Arlene Kushner asks whether Mahmoud Abbas and his party are moderate
and whether they are legitimate peace negotiation partners. This
divides into several subquestions, starting with: (1) are they able
to control Samaria and Judea? The answer is NO. Is Abbas corrupt? The
answer is YES. Is he a strong leader. The answer is NO. (2) Does
Abbas intend to be a Peace Partner? All the signs say NO. This is a
fact-filled logically-presented discussion on whether the Palestinian
state Olmert is so intent on creating has any chance of being a
viable structure and a peaceful neighbor.
THE WILL TO SURVIVE; SURVIVING WITH HOPE
The latest from the journal of that remarkable couple, the
Sapersteins, previously part of the proud, productive and patriotic
community of Neve Dekalim, Gush Katif, Gaza and now part of a
demoralized, underemployed community living in paper caravans, a
community struggling to survive the afflictions inflicted on them by
an uncaring government. This reads like a HOW-TO survive as
menchen.
GUSH KATIF REFUGEES CONFRONT RAIN, RATS AND A RIDICULOUS BUREAUCRACY
This is a compilation of recent items on the plight of the people of
Gush Katif, Gaza that were converted from a productive and thriving
community into a bunch of unemployed refugees. And this by their own
government, which had spent time training the army and police to oust
the people but had not bothered to plan how and where to relocate them
and provide them adequate housing, jobs and schools. As we've read
over the years from the Sapersteins (google "saperstein" Think-Israel,
top of home page), the temporary paper caravans that serve as their
new homes were badly set into position. The latest rains have helped
the rats; but they haven't pushed the do-nothing bureaucracy into
doing anything except maybe moving their jaws a bit more vigorously.
DAN BAR-ON'S DEFAMATORY PSYCHOBABBLE
Usually the Israel Academia Monitor lets leftist ideologues
expose themselves and the ideas they inculcate in Israeli youth
simply by presenting us with articles they have written. In this essay,
Joel Amitai draws us a character sketch of Dan Bar-On of Ben-Gurion
University (BGU), one of the most egregious of Israel's "psycho babblers." I
wonder if BGU will award him a research prize as did Hebrew U, in
acclaiming a study that claimed that the IDF was racist because the
soldiers didn't rape Arab women (see here.)
A GLIMPSE INTO THE MINDSET OF A JUDICIAL OLIGARCH
What is practicised by Israel's leftist judiciary is described
politely as "judicial activism" and, more accurately, as "judicial
tyranny". It has become one of Israel's major problems, severely
crippling her ability to defend herself against Arab terrorists. As
Rabbi Steven Pruzansky puts it, "The dangers of subjectivity in law
–– by a self-perpetuating judicial oligarchy answerable to
no one, composed exclusively of like-minded liberals who are charged
with appointing their successors –– became apparent. It
was now easy to understand how Jewish teenagers who had blocked
a highway to protest the Gaza expulsion could be sentenced to two
years in prison." And why terrorists are afforded more protection
than Israel's Jewish citizenry.
LIP THE LIAR AND HARDLY HA HA
Boris Celser presents us with a bitter satire on Bush and Olmert,
puppeteer and totally compliant puppet, who together preside over a
sick Israeli administration –– an administration that
kowtows to the Arab and disdains the Jew. It is a country that has
deviated so far from its moral core that Jews are not allowed to pray
openly on the Temple Mount. When they are permitted access, they may
pray to their God but they mustn't move their lips. And the Arabs keep
a sharp watch. Back in 1967, the local Arabs were ––
casually and with no public discussion –– given control of
Judaism's holy site. And the people has allowed this distorted state
of affairs to continue for some 40 years. It's time this stopped.
THE LATEST DAMAGE TO ANTIQUITIES ON THE TEMPLE MOUNT
When Israel conquered the eastern part of Jerusalem in 1968, the Arabs
came, hoping they'd be allowed to worship quietly on the Al-Aqsa
Mosque. Moshe Dayan made the grand gesture of giving effective control
of the Temple Mount to the Waqf. Over the years, the Arabs have become
bolder and have shown how little respect they have for Jewish worship.
They have increasingly violated the laws governing new construction
and preserving antiquities. Nadav Shragai tells us about the most
recent Arab violations: endangering the structure by illegal
construction and destroying artefacts that point to an ancient Jewish
presence. What is appalling is that the Israeli government, initially
fearful of calling attention to Arab non-compliance with the Oslo
Accords, never called a halt to this flagrant destruction. The
government doesn't act because it fears the Arabs will riot; they are
not ashamed of allowing the desecration of Judaism's most sacred site.
Nor are they swayed by polite protest.
NO PLACE FOR A SON OF ZIONISM
Israel is proud of doing its upmost not to injure Arabs that are not
obviously terrorists, even though the Arabs take advantage by hiding
among civilians and using their children as couriers, even sending
them in to collect the guns from dead terrorists, secure in the
knowledge that the IDF will not shoot. But Israel's foolish protection
of the lives of "innocent" Arabs to the point of jeopardizing the
lives of her own children and soldiers has consequences. Israel's
using her soldiers to throw Jews out of their homes as in Gaza and
Amona also has consequences. Michelle Nevada spells out one of them
–– it has soured diaspora Jews who are strongly Zionistic
from encouraging their sons to join the IDF. As Nevada puts it, "It is
a place where those who are religious are held back from the best
positions in the service, a place where they are interrogated about
whether their loyalty is to the IDF or to the Torah, and a place where
they must be forced to chose between the two. If you choose to keep
your religious ideals, you go to jail." The consequences may be
unintended but they are real.
INDEPENDENT EXPERT: IDF BULLETS DIDN'T KILL MOHAMMED AL-DURA
At the beginning of the second intifada in 2000, a photograph of a man
and his son unsuccessfully trying to avoid Israeli gunfire won the
sympathy of the world. Among the Palestinians, the child, Mohammed
al-Dura, was commemorated as a martyr and became a role model for the
Arab youth. France 2 claimed his death had been caught on tape, but it
later became clear the shooting was a hoax. Positioned where they
were, the IDF could not have shot him. What still isn't clear is
whether the hoax was perpetrated independently by the Arab camera man,
or by him and his boss, Charles Enderlin, with collusion by France 2,
the TV station that broadcast the scene. In fact, it isn't clear that
Al-Dura is dead. Adi Schwartz writes that an independent investigator
has cleared the IDF of responsibility. And in time, the hoax will
unravel –– but the damage it has done is not as easily undone.
HOW RACHEL CORRIE REALLY DIED (HINT: NOT PROTECTING A HOUSE)
Rachel Corrie, a member of the Marxist International Solidarity
Movement (ISM) and a strong supporter of the Palestinians was killed
in March 2003. The world was told she was run over –– twice –– by an
Israeli tractor. Rachel Corrie won fame as did Mohammad al-Dura. Both
served the Arab cause against Israel. Both had deaths that shocked and
sorrowed the world. In both cases, eye witnesses confirmed that their
deaths were caused by the IDF. Both were treated as martyrs and
memorialized in various ways. After the initial shock, both deaths
were seen as puzzling and suspicion increased that they were staged.
Years later, we learn that the IDF was not responsible in either
death. In fact, there is strong evidence in al-Dura's case and
circumstantial evidence in Corrie's that they were done in by the
Palestinians.
THE BLACKOUT – A HAMAS-ALJAZEERA CO-PRODUCTION/STAGED GAZA BLACKOUT PICTURES
These pictures of the Gaza blackout are instructive. There is no way
that the pathos-filled pictures could have made their way to print
without the collusion of Arab photographers, who took them at angles
that hid the light and the truth. The news editors are equally
culpable. They presumably knew that the Gazans were not in an
electricity blackout. They knew that creating hoaxes is an often-used
tool in Arab propaganda. Why did they print the Israel-demonizing
pictures without verification?
LIGHTS [OFF]. CAMERA. ACTION
Israel has often needlessly taken the blame for Arab death ––
e.g., Mohammed al-Dura and the family that set off an explosive while
having a Gaza beach picnic. It was later –– much later –– discovered
Israel wasn't responsible. Even when they do respond to Arab hoaxes
and ordinary mistatements, exaggerations and just plain lies, Israeli
counter information most often comes too little and too late –– long
after the damage has been done.. Amir Mizroch writes about the Gaza
blackout story, focusing on the mistakes made by the Israelis. As is
often the case in Israeli botch-ups, the culprit was poor
communication within a bureaucracy that may fear bad press but hasn't
mastered how to produce timely counter responses.
ARAB BELLIGERENCE, ISRAELI SELF-ABASEMENT
Dr. Kenneth Levin points out that despite the many opportunities
Israel has had to "to unmask the murderous hypocrisy of Palestinian
leaders talking 'two-state solution' and 'mutual recognition' in
speeches to Western audiences while militating for a single, Arab,
state in all the land when talking in Arabic...," Israeli leaders do
not. Nor do they object publicly to how its peace partner
Egypt continues to demonize the Jews, producing vile propaganda that
inculcates hate through the Arab world. They ignore both Arab words
and Arab hostile deeds. But this will not bring peace. Israel longs to
be a normal nation. Then it should explain to the world the "true
challenges posed by its enemies –– challenges that preclude for the
present any possibility of genuine peace." That is what a normal
nation would do.
ISRAEL'S SELVES AND HER USE OF HASBARA (ADVOCACY)
Barbara Barron utilizes Jungian concepts to sketch out an analysis of
what is wrong with Israeli hasbara. She suggests that Israel's
"...persona of hardiness and resilience has become more and more rigid
and inflexible, perhaps as a reaction to her realisation of the
shadow, in the shape of her growing sense of unease about how she is
perceived and often, it seems, willfully misunderstood, by the rest of
the world ...[which] is in turn exacerbated by the way in which her
government spokespeople fail to represent her fully in the
international arena, and, worse, often seem publicly to undermine
their country's ethos." The result is she shows all the signs of the
"emotionally bullied" individual. A remedy is to be found if Israel
would repeat what she knows is the truth to counter Arab lies, no
matter how often it takes "for the message to be got across." Perhaps
in doing the obviously necessary, she will heal herself.
PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST AS A DHIMMIFIED MAN
Many news media, book publishers, museums, art galleries, movie houses
and culture centers in Europe fear that Muslims will react with
violence to any article or work of art that might be considered
insulting to their religion. After all, documented reaction has
included everything from rioting to murder. So they have taken to
self-censorship, refusing to publish or produce items in a
pre-appeasement ritual to potential Muslim disapproval. Or they remove
a long-established item because it might offend Muslims. A feature of
this self-censorship is that it often takes place with no threatening
input from Muslims, whereas the same culture gatekeepers loftily
dismiss Jewish and Christian protests against their religions
as an affront to free speech.
NOT EVEN PRETENDING TO BE FAIR: THE NEW YORK TIMES ON GAZA
Barry Rubin dissects a recent article on Gaza from the New York
Times and demonstrates how the Times carelessly ignores
facts and how they insert sly suggestions that Israel is responsible
for the distress of the Gaza Arabs. Perhaps the Paper of Record is
after a Guinness Book record on how much slander and distortion can be
written about Israel in the smallest amount of space. If so, they have
competition from several other main stream papers that claim to be
more truthful than the National Inquirer.
THE MIDDLE EAST'S TRIBAL AFFLICTION
Daniel Pipes reviews a new book by Philip Carl Salzman, which
discusses the importance of the tribal social structure to the
understanding of Arab society. The family-clan-tribal structure,
common to many Islamic societies, coupled with "tyrannical
centralism", would account for key aspects of "Middle Eastern family
life", including cousin marriage –– which increases the number of
children with genetic abnormalities –– polygyny and honor killings.
Pipes also makes the point that Arab tribal structure, by its very
nature, is highly resistant to a quick fix.
ISLAM AND THE JEWS: THE STATUS OF JEWS AND CHRISTIANS IN MUSLIM LANDS, 1772ce
"In 1772," Jacob Marcus wrote, "a Muslim scholar in Cairo was asked
how Jews and Christians should be treated." This text is his reply. It
is in keeping with earlier Muslim practices (see, e.g., Andrew G.
Bostom (ed.), The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: From Sacred Texts
to Solemn History) and indicates a continuity in discrimination
against Christians and Jews throughout Islamic history. It certainly
calls into question modern spins on Muslim intolerance –– that it is
due to their unhappiness with what Israel and America are doing; that
it is due to a few irrational fanatics on the fringe of the religion;
that it is due to Muslim shame at being left behind by western
technology and science; and that it is due to modern dictatorships and
would disappear if democracy –– usually defined as the right to vote,
which many Muslim dictatorships already have –– was adopted in Muslim
countries.
THWARTING SCIENCE AND MEDICINE: WHAT PART DOES FOREIGN FUND-UNDERWRITING PLAY?
If any field is immune to sharia takeover, you'd think long-term
investigation in medicine would be. Marion D.S. Dreyfus describes
what a sharia invasion would do to such research –– it
would dry it up. Israel would go from being a major contributor to
scientific and medical journals to the current level of research from
the Arab countries, which is close to zero. More generally, this essay
asks: what happens when politics and ideology invade science?
THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD'S INFILTRATION OF THE WEST
The Muslim Brotherhood spawned the terrorist group, Hamas, but it also
spreads its influence in ways that are less violent but just as
dangerous. It controls mosques and it has paid for and successfully
infiltrated political, social, academic and banking institutions and
organizations in the Middle East, Europe and increasingly in America.
Since its beginning in the 1920s, it has planned big and well in
advance and it has sufficient oil money to implement its plans. It has
been remarkably successful. Frightenly so. Fjordman gives us a picture
of the Brotherhood's reach and reviews some of the pertinent articles
about it. In America, judging from puff pieces written about them,
they have coopted a goodly number of academics and media people. And
their spiritual leader, Yusif al-Qaradawi, has been directly implicated
in the Danish cartoon riots.
SLEEPING WITH DEADLY JIHADI TERRORISTS
Babu Suseelan provides us with a terrifying but accurate picture of
what Muslim terrorists are doing in India against Hindus: "...
homicide bombing, killing of innocent Hindus, destruction of temples,
research institutions, burning passenger trains, hijacking airplanes
and assassination..." Sound familiar? I'm surprised Condoleeza Rice
hasn't yet blamed it all on Israeli intransigence.
THE CLASH OF IDEOLOGIES IN AFRICA: KENYA
Kenya has become a news-worthy place, thanks to its association with
the Democratic presidential candidate, Barack Obama, who was raised
there as a Muslim and now declares himself a Christian. Kenya is also,
as David J. Jonsson writes, a place where Islam and Christianity have
been in ideological conflict, and where Islam is projected the winner.
As Jonsson reminds us, Islam brings with it its violence, its
all-encompassing shari'a law and its triumphalist ambition to
spread its ideology globally.
KOSOVO: ISLAMISM'S NEW BEACHHEAD?
Julia Gorin raises concerns about America's sanctioning
Kosovo's breakaway from Serbia to become another Muslim state. She
points out that post-9/11, is it "... the free world's business to
spread Shari'a law, as is always the upshot of any Islamicizing
region?" It will more than likely serve as an al-Qaida base, because
of the al-Qaida links to the KLA. Moreover, approving Kosovo's
breakaway sets a bad precedence for how to handle belligerent
minorities around the globe, Muslim and non-Muslim.
THE KOSOVO PRECEDENT
This article by Arieh Eldad focuses on what the implications of a
Kosovo breakaway are to Israel. If Israel accepts the Kosovo
separation, then it has cut itself off at the knees, having no reason
to reject, say, the Arabs in the Galilee demanding the area become
theirs. For that matter, taking it a step further, what will America
do as the Azlatans –– a group advocating the return of the
American southwest to Mexico –– grow more vociferous and begin to
"liberate" California on the grounds that the whites are an unwelcome
minority?
CHURCH ANTI-ISRAEL ACTIVISM AND ANTISEMITISM
This is a remarkable examination of anti-semitism in the Presbyterian
Church by an Elder of the Church, who has divested himself of slogans
and superficial explanations for the phenomenon of the current and
growing hostility to Jews by mainline churches. He looks at the
problem from several viewpoints, and trashes many of the usual
reasons to justify the Church's hostility.
THE METHODIST CHILD INDOCTRINATION LEAGUE
If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, the Methodists are now
actively imitating the earlier drive by the Presbyterians to divest
themselves of stock in companies doing business with Israel. But they
have gone well beyond their mentors. Mark Tooley writes how The United
Methodist Women's Division is even targetting the Methodist young with
hate-Israel messages gussied up as instructional stories on how to
empathize with the Po' Palestinians. Oh those evil
THE FRAUDULENT SCHOLARSHIP OF PROFESSORS WALT AND MEARSHEIMER
Professor's Walt and Mearsheimer's book has become a foundation text
for many a nutter's article on anti-Jewish websites. Now that Jimmy
Carter has been discredited –– partially by his own statements –– the
anti-Jew lobby has little but sleezoid writings to give them
accreditation except for the study by real professors from fancy
schools –– Walt and Mearsheimer, from U of Chicago and Harvard yet.
Alex Safian takes a look at how academically sound their work is. He
focuses specifically on some of the book's factually incorrect
statements, significant omissions and unsubstantiated conclusions. If
their universities reflected the level of their scholarship, they'd be
teaching at "Get-yr-phd-in-2-mos University.
IGNORANCE CANNOT BE REALISTIC: A CRITIQUE OF THE MEARSHEIMER-WALT THESIS
Ofira Seliktar examines Walt and Mearsheimer's book, which is written
from the point of view of realist theory applied to
international relations, and provides us with an excellent
understanding of why the book fails so badly as an informed analysis:
the authors have little real knowledge of the Middle East. They assume
the Arabs have Western-rational goals. Casting Israel as Middle
Eastern bogeyman of the Western world is actually their bizarre
attempt to salvage their school of thought, which had totally failed
to explain 9/11 and does not comprehend the mindset of the Arab
leaders. As Seliktar writes of their invalid conclusions: "They were
trying to solve an imaginary problem, since their puzzlement arose
from their mistake of recasting the region into a tight realist mold
that did not fit its realities." The paper also provides an excellent
summary of why the Peace Process hasn't worked and can not work
– it runs counter to the Arab goal of destroying Israel; they
have no intention of living with Israel in neighborly peace.
WHEN JIHAD CAME TO AMERICA
Want to know how our grandchildren will date when Islam brought its
jihad against the U.S.A directly to America? Not on 9/11. No. It was
earlier. It was in 1990, when they assassinated Rabbi Meir Kahane, a
Jew who couldn't be intimidated and who promulgated the then radical
idea that the Arabs be transferred out of Biblical Israel. Against all
the evidence to the contrary, the killing was declared a lone act of
violence by the FBI, which –– just like these days
–– took its time translating much of the Arabic
handwritten notes found in the assassin's apartment. Three years
later, other members of his cell made the first attempt to destroy the
World Trade Center. It was only partially successful, but it was a
morale-booster and gave the jihadists valuable information for a more
dramatic future attack. Andrew C. McCarthy provides us with a vivid
account of the killing of Rabbi Kahane by an Arab from Egypt who was
part of a jihadist cell training for various acts of terror under the
guidance of the "Blind Sheik," Omar Abdel Rahman.
RAV MEIR KAHANE'S 2007 YAHRZEIT
This is a companion piece to McCarthy's article (see above). In his
time Rabbi Kahane was reviled as a racist for baldly saying it's them
or us vis a vis the Arabs and the Jews. He frightened people by
telling them the obvious: there really are some binary events with no
in-between. The sun shining in the middle of the night is
impossible. If the sun is shining, it isn't night. He was one of the
first victims of the newest Arab war against the West, the first
certainly on American soil. Now the secular Jews advocate what he
preached –– separation between Arabs and Jews. They want
it so much, they are willing to give up Biblical Israel and much more.
This is the speech Meir Jolowitz gave at the Rememberance Service 17
years after Rabbi Kahane was –– do we call it
murder or assassination?.
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY'S WAHHABI FRONT
I don't know what the going rate is for full control of a American
university but as Patrick Poole demonstrates, the Saudis are getting
their money's worth from a paltry 20 meg donation to Georgetown
University that endowed a Center dedicated to Muslim-Christian
understanding. "The Center's director, John Esposito, has been known
for his vigorous apologetics for Islamic extremism, ... and the Center
has affiliated with institutions and people that front for and speak
for Hamas and Hamas' parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood. And
they have hired staff such as Susan Douglass, who once taught at the
Islamic Saudi Academy, which graduated several students who went on to
commit acts of terrorism; she now turns out propagandizing textbooks
on the K-12 level. In short, the Center has become an effective
conduit for promoting the acceptance of wahhabi-style Islam and
infiltrating it into the larger community.
ISRAEL'S FOLLY
This is an impassioned yet sensible essay by Hugh Fitzgerald
summarizing how far the world has progressed in comprehending that
Muslim aggressiveness can not be appeased but must be repelled.
Unfortunately, the politicians and the diplomats and the so-called
leadership in Israel and this country seem the least enlightened,
still believing they can sway Islam to civilized neighborliness. "But,"
Fitzgerald writes, "[t]he logic of events, the inevitability of Muslim
aggressive demands and Muslim violence within the countries of Western
Europe, and nothing else, will make that reassessment [of what Islam
is really after] happen. All Israel has to do is to hold on, not give
in, do nothing to whet, by further surrenders to the sly Slow
Jihadists of Fatah." The problem reduces then to: how to keep Israel
from foolishly divesting itself of its land until the tide of global
public opinion turns against the Muslims.
THE ZIONIST REVOLUTION
Most people have only a vague idea about what the Zionist revolution
entails. Nevertheless, it is fashionable –– especially for those who
do their meditation sitting on Tel-Aviv bar stools –– to insist that
Zionism is dead. Yehuda HaCohen makes the point that, on the contrary,
the Revolution is still in its infancy and is just beginning –– as
Israel's achievements in science and technology indicate –– to blossom
for the benefit of mankind. As the Jews slough off the
European-Marxist ideologies of the first generation kibbutzim and go
back to their own roots, that's when the Zionist revolution will
really begin in earnest.
THE FALLACY OF GRIEVANCE-BASED TERRORISM
Melvin E. Lee's thesis is that we labor under "[t]he fundamental
premise .. that grievances with U.S. policies in the Middle East
motivate Islamist terrorism." He makes clear that "[s]uch assumptions
... misunderstand the enemy and its nature. In reality, the conflict
is sparked not by grievance but rather by incompatibility between
Islamist ideology and the natural rights ... incorporated into U.S.
political culture." Accepting that Islam has genuine grievances
against us –– they blame their economic, technological and
social stagnation on the West –– leads us to a policy of
appeasement, which only encourages the Jihadists to increased
hostility. To understand the roots of Islamic terrorism, we need to
look not at their long list of grievances but at their culture and
religion. This will take a major overhaul of our attitude of moral
relativity, whereby we accept most groups at their own evaluation.
It's a big part of our multicultural view of the world, but it won't
help us develop useful ways to deal with adherents of a religion that
blames us and never themselves for their misery. Lee suggests some
major changes in our tactics.
HOW DO I KNOW? (ABOUT ISLAM)
Dr. Babu Suseelan counters the pernicious and paralyzing argument that
only a Muslim can understand the Muslim religious experience
–– and by implication –– interfere with or
condemn the actions of a Muslim. Dr. Suseelan replies that experience
can be a starting point but not a terminator of outside examination.
"One can gain knowledge and insight about Islamic theocracy without
believing in Koranic concepts...most people acquire the view that
Jihadi terrorism and suicide bombing are wrong on no experience of
terrorism or bombing..." Consistency and coherence "with other common
views and historical facts" serve us as guides to what we accept. It
is important that we be able to question the Islamic belief system,
especially when their adherents are attempting to inflict their values
on the rest of us.
THE ROOTS OF THE MUSLIM VICTIM MENTALITY AND HOW TO FIGHT ISLAM
Iranians are Muslim, but not Arabic. Amil Imani views himself as a
descendent of ancient Persia and shrugs off the Islam superimposed on
the populace when the Arabs conquered Persia –– now Iran –– in the mid
7th Century. In this essay he describes the Muslim character as shaped
by Muhammed's personality and notions. He then suggests general
principles to fight the threat that Islam has become to the West.
PAY NOW, GET NOTHING LATER
Barry Rubin explains how the Arabs easily overwhelm the West and
Israel by a simple con game that cleverly plays on the Western feeling
of responsibility and desire for fairness and its willingness to
negotiate: Oh pity us, we've been victimized by you, so pay attention
to our grievances. If you want us to trust you, you must build up our
confidence in you by giving us gifts. "But," Rubin points out, "the
real problem is the Arabic-speaking world's political structure and
prevalent ideology. Nothing outsiders can do will change this very
much, or at all." So it's time we stop making concessions and start
expecting responsible behavior from the Arabs.
ISLAMIZATION OF EUROPE AND POLICIES TO PREVENT IT, POLICY AREA 8
No Sharia has now finished writing about the 8th Policy Area in his
model. It concerns the best policy regarding immigration, visas and
citizenship. He starts with defining our most dangerous enemy –– it is
not the terrorists but the moderate muslims (moderate in the Muslim
meaning of the word). He then formulates the main goals for an
immigration policy of an European country, before specifying the rules
and principles concerning tourist visas, temporary residence permits,
permanent residence permits and citizenships. The intent, as always,
is to develop ways of preventing further Islamization of Europe.
WHO'S ZOOMIN' WHOM?
Michael Zebulon has the gift of making it fun to learn some necessary
information we should all know about "Palestine" and the "Palestinian
people". The Arabs have another kind of gift –– they have been able to
invent a people –– the Palestinians –– and a country called Palestine,
where this people is said to have dwelt from ancient times. Never mind
that there is no P in Arabic, so ironically, having a suspected
terrorist say Palestine is an effective shibboleth. But we have
the facts of geography and history available and they are an excellent
way to counter the Arab fantasy. We simply need to speak up whenever
we hear the fantasy.
BRITAIN'S TREACHERY, FRANCE'S REVENGE
This is an article by Meir Zamir from Ha'Aretz about British
plotting against Israel/Zionism and against France circa 1944-1948,
and in favor of Arab nationalism. One reader of the original article
commented, "I hope Professor Zamir is frantically writing it up as a
book. This will be a major contribution to our understanding of the
real dynamics in the Middle East after WWII."
READERS' BLOG-EDS This is where our readers get a chance to write opinions and editorials and share articles they find informative. The Blog-Eds page for the month is updated every few days. A Blog-Ed page has a quick list of the articles from which you can access any of the articles immediately. To go to the list, click the "Blog-Eds List" box in the Blue Strip on the top of the Blog-Ed page. January 2008 BLOG-EDS
READ MORE
| ||||||||||||||
|
November-December, 2007
NO PEACE, NO PEACE PLANS, NO PRICE FOR PEACE ––
A SHORT GUIDE TO THOSE OBSESSED WITH PEACE
Moshe Sharon has personal experience of how wily and manipulative
Arabs can be in what Westerners regard as straight-forward diplomatic
negotiations. As he puts it, "...in the bazaar of the Arab-Israeli
conflict, the two sides are not discussing the same merchandise." and
"...if you are clever enough you can sell nothing at a price." In this
essay he provides us with some useful guidelines in bargaining with
Arabs. And the Arabs won't be ready to bargain seriously until they
"... have lost all hope of annihilating the Jewish state.."
A NEW DEFINITION OF 'PEACE'
Michelle Nevada, the essayist, speaks for many of us in noting that
the word peace is content-free. It is all things to
diplomats and nothing of any real use to the rest of us. To be of
use, peace should bear some relationship to "life, as we know
it, ... a potpourri of conflict, struggle, noise and dissonance." As
it is for the person, it is for the country. "To exist, people and
nations must fight to survive. If we fail, we die –– and only in death
do we have 'peace'." Truly, a liberating concept.
THE SCIENTIFIC PRELUDE TO AN ODE TO ANNAPOLIS
Elyakim Haetzni makes a habit of predicting the next stupid
capitulation of Israel's leaders to Arab and American demands and
their next pre-programmed hostile action aimed at Israel's religious
and patriotic "settlers". He warned that P.M. Olmert would try to
divide Jerusalem and cede Biblical Israel as starters to total abject
surrender of national pride and national land. The implementation of
these idiotic and dangerous actions seems to have started –– Olmert
and Abbas are "negotiating" –– Olmert is ready to give all and Abbas
to take all and give nothing.
BLOGGERS ON THE UPCOMING ANNAPOLIS SUMMIT
These are articles from various blogsites before the Annapolis
Summit/Conference/Meeting and General Give-Away. They make points
downplayed in the mainstream media about the upcoming Annapolis
Conference. These are just some of the many sites on the internet that
care about Israel's future. They are more representative of the actual
feeling of both Americans and Israelis than the mouthings of the
American State Department and a few traitor Jews in both countries.
GANG-RAPE IN ANNAPOLIS, SAUDI STYLE
Picture this: a large number of Arab countries, their current
"friends" –– Russia, Europeans and the anti-Israel NGOs –– and, shame,
shame, the U.S.A. ganged up on one side. And Israel all alone on the
other. It's a mockup of the U.N. General Assembly (GA), and like the
GA, makes a mockery of fairness to Israel. As Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.
notes, "The bigger problem is that the government of Ehud Olmert seems
disposed to go along with the emerging 'international consensus.'”
Bad news for Israel.
UN MACHINATIONS AGAINST ISRAEL
The aftermath to Annapolis: a dash to the U.N. to get a Security
Council endorsement of the Annapolis 'we've agreed to talk about
thinking about when ...' This would reposition Annapolis –– Israel
would now be pitted against the Security Council. This wasn't
sanctioned by the White House. The State Dept seems to have tried to
do an end-around around Bush and get the U.N. to certify to its
version of what was agreed upon –– rather like the Intelligence
Community trying to make policy with their Iran N.E.I., which is
certainly so much more fun that doing dull assessments. Ed Lasky
provides us with a surprising linkage –– namely, the
Lebanese anti-semitic USA Ambassador to the UN; a Jew of the
Democratic Party persuasion, who has sworn to destroy Bush and, oh
yes, make Israel secular and multicultural; and an ex-Annan flunkie,
whose job it was to make the UN oil scandal go away.
CULTURE OF KVETCH
Sarah Honig writes about an earlier Arab-Israeli peace meeting and the
Israeli negotiators who were so intent on making a peace deal with
Yassir Arafat –– Abbas' old crony and boss ––
they never noticed he had no set of demands that, fulfilled, would get
him to agree to a peace treaty with Israel. It took a disgracefully
long time for the Israeli negotiating team to realize that they were
making so many unrequited concessions for peace that pretty soon
there'd be no Israel to enjoy the peace they were hoping for. A
pathetic bunch. And Olmert has learned nothing from their stupidity.
THE LOOMING DANGER OF ANNAPOLIS
Shmuel Katz reminds us of the important matter: the Arabs had not and
have no intention now to carry out their responsibilities under the
previous peace plan –– the Road Map –– and
here they were at Annapolis, primed to demand another Palestinian
state, with all their unfulfilled contractual promises ignored. Yet
Israel in the person of Ehud Olmert was and is eager to strip itself
of land and of self-respect, willing to make concessions that endanger
its existence.
THE CONDOLEEZZA STORY
A way of viewing the Annapolis sitcom is to see it as a structure
designed for and by its initiator, major promoter and
arbiter of protocol, Condoleezza Rice. Professor Emmanuel Sivan
suggests her performance is rooted in her mediocrity, her
"intellectual frailty and character weakness". Fortunately, she'll be
history soon –– running some girl's college into the ground, perhaps.
But, unfortunately, she can do a lot of damage in the short time
left, especially when she is dealing with a compliant Israeli
government.
FARCE. BURYING THE BUSH DOCTRINE IN ANNAPOLIS
In September, 2001, just after 911, speaking to the uncommitted and to
jihadists everywhere, George Bush said, "You are either with us or
against us." There was a clear differentiation between the problem
–– terrorism –– and the solution
–– terrorists had made us their enemy and we would fight
them. Then we began backtracking. The final shattering of the Bush
doctrine came with the Annapolis meeting. As Andrew C. McCarthy puts
it, "Seduced by the fantasy of peace-loving Palestinians, the
president and his top diplomats have made creation of a sovereign
state for these blood-soaked jihadists the bedrock of our Middle East
policy –– thus undercutting any credibility the Bush
Doctrine may have had."... "This administration is hellbent on
granting statehood to savages who worship 'martyrdom,' who have bombed
their way to the table, and whose non-negotiable demand ––
a 'right of return' to Israel for millions of migrant Palestinians
–– would sound the death-knell for a civilized democracy
that is our only true friend in the region." What a terrible way to
treat a friend; what a foolish way to treat an enemy.
BUT TO DO AND DIE
Annapolis may be over but it reeinforced the traditional aftermath of
a Arab-Israeli "peace conference" –– Arabs will need to do nothing and
Israel is to make land giveaways. If there's a change, it's that the
America is giving up its "honest broker" pretense and has appointed a
monitor to ensure Israel's compliance to do and die for a Palestinian
state. Sarah Honig's excellent essay makes us understand Israel's
demoralizing future, thanks to policy (re)set in Annapolis.
NO LASTING PEACE –– THE ILLUSIONS OF ANNAPOLIS
Ralph Peters has concluded that "[s]hort of intolerable carnage,
there's no durable solution to the Israeli-Palestinian problem. None.
" The Arabs don't want peace; it would throw things out of kilter.
There'd be a large group of unemployed men, whose only job skill is
killing people. Moreover, Arab leaders wouldn't have Israel to blame
for their incompetence. No, that would never do. And there is the
elephant-sized fact that Israel is tiny. There is simply no room for
two states in it.
AFTER ANNAPOLIS, WHAT?
What a sensible article this is! Edward Bernard Glick strips away the
blarney about how Israel should, all by itself, carry the morality
torch for all of the Middle East and talks about the critical issue
–– survival. He points out, "In the zero-sum-game Middle
East, if you don't win, you lose." For Israel that means she must
worry less about inflicting civilian casualties and more about winning
big.
What is most unforgivable is the agony and suffering Israel
inflicted on some of its most loyal and productive citizens, turning
them from proud contributors to Israel's economy to
demoralized, jobless dependents of the state.
This quote is from
Guysen International News, December 19, 2007: "28 months after the
disengagement, 85% of the evacuated families are still living in
temporary housing. The delay by the government to find permanent
accommodation for the expelled from Gush Katif and northern Samaria
has already cost the state 1 billion shekels and will cost another
140 million shekels yearly if it continues. This information was
presented in a new study carried out by the Sadan-Lowenthal center
led by Professor Ezra Sadan, former head of the Treasury."
We wonder where Olmert plans to resettle the up to half-million Jews
living in Samaria and Judea and eastern Jerusalem he and the Bush
Administration are planning to kick out of their homes, farms,
businesses and synagogues. As we pointed out in the September 2007
editorial
GOODBYE TO ALL THAT
Moshe and Rachel Saperstein together with 9000 other Israeli Jews
were expelled from their homes in Gush Katif, Gaza in August 2005.
They have written essays about their (mis)adventures dealing with a
government that was competent only in harassing them and driving them
from their homes –– a government that had made almost no preparation
for handling this mass evacuation and has still not made amends. In this
latest of their essays, Moshe recalls when the expelled Jews were
allowed back to their former homes for the day to pack their things.
THIRTY YEARS IN THIRTY MINUTES
This is a powerful essay expressing the emotions Anita Tucker has felt
since being pointlessly expelled from her home and the farm she and
family had created in Gush Katif, Gaza. They have left. The Arabs
have it all. And the land has returned to the bleakness, rocks and
sand it was when the Jews took back Gaza in 1968. The Jews made it
flourish and contributed to Israel's economy. Under Arab control, it
is unproductive –– unless you count the weapons of destructions the
Arabs have been putting together there and using against Israel.
Clearly, Israel has to overcome the conditioning of years that
taught –– to put it more baldly than did their peace
conditioning –– that it was better to have her own
children murdered than kill an Arab child. She must resolve to act
in her own interest, even if this means suffering sustained
international condemnation, without the occasional pat on the head
when she makes another "concession."
Say "transfer out the Arabs" or "population transfer" and
conditioning kicks in –– the weapon of choice is the
epithet: "racist", "ethnic cleansing", immoral." But this ignores what
the Muslim Arabs are doing. While Israel tries different appeasement
schemes –– or maybe because Israel caters to them
–– Israeli Arabs have increasingly become radicalized and
see themselves as Palestinian or as part of the larger Arab Muslim
community, and not as Israelis. As far back as 2000, fewer than 15% of
the Israeli Arabs said they'd support their country against the
Palestinians. And they have often been implicated in helping the Arabs
in the territories commit suicide-murder. More and more, they reject
the notion that they are a minority group in a Jewish state.
Eliminating Israel as a Jewish entity has become an attractive goal
–– and they aren't agonizing about how to resettle the
Jews peacefully elsewhere. (They have successfully forced out most of
the Christian Arabs from once-Christian cities such as Bethlehem
without concern about their future.) All the Arab leaders including
supposed moderates like Sari Nusseibeh (see
here) have said straight out that Jews are not –– and
will not be –– allowed to reside in Arab countries. (What
a great way to avoid being accused of apartheid!)
Besides keeping their countries clean of
Jews, they want a form of ethnic dirtying –– they are dead serious
about moving any Arab who claims to be a refugee into Israel.
By now, the Jews have abandonned their onetime dream that they and
the Arabs would together build a splendid culture in the Middle East.
Most Israelis want to be separated from the Arabs. Here, too,
conditioning kicks in. The demographic argument that the Arabs in the
territories will swamp the country has been demolished. Yet many
Israelis –– as do people everywhere in the world
–– assume that separation must mean Israel gives up
Biblical land that legally, morally, historically and by conquest
belongs to it. This is a self-defeating notion that does not address
the problem of the untrustworthy Arabs living in Israel. Clearly,
Israel can not allow a large treasonous population inside Israel while
fending off external invaders.
If there's any good that can come from the Gaza expulsion, it is
that Sharon legitimitized expulsion when he 'disengaged' the Gazan
Jews from their land. More and more Jews have come to see they
should keep their land and transfer out the Arabs physically or
politically. Making the Arabs who live in the territories citizens of
Jordan has become a popular solution. Alternatively, they could be
given "dowries" and moved out of Israel. The latter has the advantage
that these Arabs will have a decent-sized state somewhere in the 99.9%
of the Middle East that the Arabs control without the Jews committing
suicide for it to happen. In fact, when you think about it, this could
solve a major problem without the American administration losing face.
Bush and his cohorts put high priority on the Palestinian Arabs
having a state, but why does it have to be inside Israel?
JERUSALEM IS A JEWISH ISSUE
One indication that Jerusalem is on the cutting board is P.M. Olmert's
clearly expressed annoyance that diaspora Jews believe they have a
stake in and a say about Jerusalem. Olmert claims Jerusalem is solely
an Israeli issue. Ted Belman summarizes the arguments that acknowledge
the legality of world Jewry's claim to Jerusalem. You can read more
about Israel's right to all of Jerusalem and Biblical Israel (AKA West
Bank) by reading Howard Grief's articles such as this
one. For other essays on international law that states that
biblical Israel is a trust in perpetuity for the Jewish people and can
not be given away, read Part I of
Yoram Shifftan's "A Legal Challenge." and his essay on
Gifting. Use the Google box at the top of this page to search on
Howard Grief, Yoram Shifftan, legal, mandate and population
transfer.
SMASHING THE DEMOGRAPHIC DEMON
The spectre of the Arabs overwhelming the Jewish state by producing
more babies (this actually shows signs of happening in
several European countries) has been the major argument
for Israel's giving up Biblical Israel (known as the West Bank by the
ignorati), land that is legally hers. The argument, as Emanuel Shilo
puts it, is that Israel must "choose between a state with a solid
Jewish majority without Judea and Samaria, and a bi-national state in
the entire west-of-Jordan area." The data that supported the supposed
overwhelming Arab growth has been discredited. (See this article by Bennett
Zimmerman) and Google for Yoram Ettinger's articles. Shilo's essay
goes beyond statistical proof. He points out ethical, moral and
political questions –– which warrant the extensive
consideration now given primarily to the demographic factor
THE TRIUMPH OF LEGAL DEFEATISM
The Israeli judiciary is crippling the Israeli Defense Force. It views
asserting "dominance over Israel's political and military leadership"
as what's important, not winning wars. As Caroline Glick writes, the
IDF has begun to restrict their behavior "to conform with perceived
legal restrictions" –– to avoid criminal indictments. The
left-leaning judiciary is defining the rules of the game. And that is
very dangerous for the country.
TIME TO END THE CHARADE
Salim Mansur notes that every American president since Nixon has liked
the idea of an international conference to end the "conflict between
Arabs and Jews."... "But the truth of the matter is that there is
nothing to broker when one party, the Palestinians and their
Arab-Muslim financiers and supporters, remains committed to the
destruction of the other party, the Israelis." Mansur suggests, "It is
time for Americans to politely tell the truth and end the charade of
demanding Israeli concessions for Arab-Muslim doublespeak where
'peace' means, as Arafat explained to |