Sharon continues his life, such as it is, on a respirator. As time goes by, it becomes much less likely he will ever return to politics. So it is curious that Kadima, the party that he created and which has no other important leader, continues to do well in the pre-election polls. This essay examines a likely reason.

Friends, and even erstwhile foes have all been praising Sharon not only as a great general who repeatedly saved Israel, but as a great patriot, who in his irreverent way was also a dedicated son of the Jewish people.

But even the conviction that Sharon, with all his faults, was the best leader because he was determined "to do what is necessary", does not explain fully the curious reaction of the Israeli people to his (and their) predicament. Why do Israelis, as they gradually come to realize that Sharon may not be able to lead them keep flocking to his party, ignoring its amorphous, problematic composition, its undemocratic nature, and its lack of any known concrete plans for meeting the daunting challenges facing Israel.

True, in times of national emergency people tend to support leadership, even when it is not really great. Israelis are no different. After a century of bloody conflict with the Arabs, after the Second World War and the Holocaust, Israelis are exhausted. So they seek a leader who can lighten some of the impossible burdens they bear.

The clamor for a strong father figure could, however, further damage an already brittle Israeli democracy. Suffering from an extreme concentration of power, not only political but also economic, Israel has already damaged orderly governance by too heavy a reliance on the predilections, indeed the whims, of a few central players.

In the banking industry, for example, less than half a dozen people have, for decades, been allocating hundreds of billions in loans to few big players with disastrous results. Two decades of productive investment were lost and the economy almost collapsed.

The same self-destructive concentration of excessive power has made Israeli governments unruly behemoths. Even the best managers, following a coherent policy set by a strong "board of directors" would find impossible to manage them. They have too many conflicting tasks, from allocating land and airwave rights (making winner's billionaires) to assuring the proper branding of camels and the right amount of jelly in Chanukah doughnuts. Their Byzantine bureaucracies are incapable of executing anything resembling a coherent policy. When they overcome their habitual paralysis, they implement a mishmash of conflicting political impulses, their left hand often undoing what their right hand has been trying to accomplish at great cost.

The Prime Minister's Office' for example, has so many responsibilities and concerns that it cannot possibly deal with them effectively. Yet Sharon, feeling frustrated, like other Prime Ministers, with bureaucratic foot dragging, tried to move things by assuming ever wider responsibilities, adding several ministries to his duties (after Sharon's illness his deputy, Ehud Olmert held fifteen portfolios!). But this just created worse logjams and further incapacitated government

If Israel made remarkable progress it was despite its governments. All of them were marred by serious failures, some dramatic others slow but unrelenting. Despite brilliantly winning many battles against great odds, Israeli governments invariably managed to snatch political defeat from the jaws of victory. They let a criminal terrorist organization win a propaganda war with great lies without seriously challenging them, thus losing crucial international support and permitting the PLO to implement its subversive agenda so that from a mere nuisance it became a strategic threat to Israel.

Following Socialist and then Statist economic policies, Israeli governments managed to turn a most talented people, full of energy and invention, into an economic cripple, so that most Israeli families can barely keep their heads above water, finding its nearly impossible to make it on a salary of about $1200 a month (this with prices usually higher than those in America!).

It is economic exhaustion on top of the exhaustion caused by the prolonged struggle to survive that probably accounts for the political passivity of many Israelis. Israelis have most admirably withstood pressures that few other people would withstand, including facing relentless terrorist attacks (and they withstood them - it should be stressed - without losing their humanity, still allowing Palestinian Arabs the safe freedom of Israeli cities even after the most monstrous terrorist outrages). But the combination of constant danger with a grinding daily struggle for economic survival is just too much.

Weary Israelis feel that life is too difficult. Weariness and despair bred a mystic yearning for quick fix-it solutions, for immediate messianic salvation in the form of "Peace Now" and its "peace camp" mutations.

Mystic yearnings metamorphose reality and lead to the apotheosis of those who seem to shape it. Arafat, a terrorist dictator, a mega thief who inflicted untold suffering on innocents, Jews and Arabs alike, was metamorphosed by the Israeli left into a benevolent and heroic statesman, his nation's humane father. It should not surprise us then, that the same leftist crowd controlling the Israeli media has been similarly transforming Sharon, just because they believed that he has adopted their faith by ordering Israeli withdrawals from "occupied Palestinian lands" and by supporting the creation of a Palestinian State. This alone was sufficient to turn an allegedly "murderous" man they hated so viscerally into a lovable grandfatherly figure. Nothing else mattered, neither what Sharon's endgame was, if he had any, nor what his followers may be up to, even though vague intentions came to replace policy.

A drama of Greek proportions, it may alas end in tragedy.

 
Daniel Doron is director of The Israel Center for Social and Economic Progress. Contact him at Dorondun@netvision.net.il

_________________________End of Story___________________________

HOME

Jan-Feb 2006 Featured Stories

Background Information

News On The Web