|HOME||May-June 2010 Featured Stories||Background Information||News On The Web|
An increasing number of students report that efforts to demonize Israel have intensified on college campuses. Most recently, the student senates at the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), held marathon debates about anti-Israel divestment resolutions. In May, the annual Hate Israel Week will be held on many campuses yet again.
Bruised by these painful experiences and taken aback by their increasing frequency, many pro-Israel students are concerned about the growing trend. They wonder why each time they douse anti-Israel fires, the flames reignite. They wonder what they are up against.
It's simple. They face a dedicated anti-Israel movement that is not discouraged by temporary setbacks. The Muslim Student Union (MSU) and Muslim Student Association (MSA), allied with extremist groups like Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), focus single-mindedly on one goal: demonizing Israel. This is not your normal student activism. MSU and MSA members are obsessively driven by their mission. They are determined, methodical, focused, well-funded and strictly organized. The leaders are usually devout and infuse religious and moral justifications into the movement, making hatred of Israel akin to a religious as well as social justice cause.
The MSU, MSA and SJP groups don't just plan actions for their own schools. SJP and the 600 MSU/MSA chapters across North America use the Internet to coordinate their anti-Israel strategies and to share their best practices. They exchange anti-Israel propaganda. They share fliers, props and slogans. They analyze what was effective and refine their tactics and execution for the upcoming year.
The MSU and MSA also maintain continuity. New leaders are groomed to replace leaders who graduate. Incoming students are actively recruited, welcomed into the supportive fold of the organization, indoctrinated and fired up with zeal. Other methods also ensure continuity. For example, a young man standing at the "apartheid wall" display on a California campus this past April told a reporter for the Daily 49er at California State University, Long Beach, that he is a Muslim missionary who is volunteering for three years to accompany the wall and "educate" students about it.
The methods used by the MSU, MSA and SJP have only one goal instilling hatred and intolerance against Israel and anyone who dares to defend it and the sincerity of its search for peaceful coexistence. They launch slick campaigns, street theater and campus displays like the "Apartheid Wall." They orchestrate demonstrations against pro-coexistence speakers and host pseudo-academic panels. They showcase far too many speakers whose only credentials are a Jewish background and a willingness to spew anti-Israel propaganda. They bid for academic credibility by asking professors hostile to Israel to co-sponsor their events. (For example, the programs for UCSD's May 2010 anti-Israel week are co-sponsored by academic departments.) They form coalitions with campus groups by supporting popular student causes and by claiming they are activists for social justice and human rights, when in fact their only purpose is to vilify Israel, and they ignore the serial human rights abuses rampant in other countries. They work to promote their agenda in student government and the student newspaper.
Once they've laid this groundwork, the MSU, MSA and SJP move on to bolder measures: recommending punishment for Israel that their new allies will support, such as divestment. Divestment resolution campaigns, in turn, mainstream their anti-Israel message and bring it to an ever-wider circle through debates in student government and media coverage.
All of these tactics are part of a carefully thought-out, well-orchestrated, long-term offensive for turning Israel and its supporters into campus pariahs. This larger movement is at the root of anti-Israel actions on campuses. Most Israel supporters ignore this larger picture, hoping that the fires will burn out and go away. But they are not going away. The movement is becoming more entrenched and more aggressive for two reasons: One is that the zeal of MSU, MSA and SJP membership is growing, fed partially by their successes and by their financial supporters. Even when they don't win campaigns like divestment resolutions and in most cases they know in advance that winning is impossible they consider it a victory that divestment was seriously discussed and that they created a platform to air their propaganda and to put Israel on trial. As divestment leaders commented after losing the vote at Berkeley, "We lost the vote but won the night. We made a statement recorded for posterity and forced everyone to listen and watch."
The second reason for the growing aggression of MSU, MSA and SJP is their expectation of a disorganized response from Israel's supporters. Pro-Israel students are focused on other things, like school, their social lives and their futures, as students should be. They did not go to college expecting they would have to defend their identity or Israel. But on too many campuses, they are rudely awakened. Most become involved not because they intended to or have some sense of mission, but out of necessity.
Consequently, pro-Israel students are often caught off guard and unprepared for new anti-Israel ambushes, as happened with the UCSD student senate divestment bill this past April. The bill suddenly appeared on the agenda, and they had only a few days to put together presentations opposing it. Yet the divestment proponents had prepared for a year, recruiting allies and polishing their speeches, slogans and video presentations of Jewish far leftists and anti-Israel activists like Anna Baltzer and Hedy Epstein.[Ed Note: Epstein was involved in the Gaza Flotilla. At the last minute, she didn't go on board but waited for her buddies at the ISM office in Cyprus.]
The pro-Israel students cannot be entirely faulted for their inconsistent responses. They are often conflicted about what to do. They are hamstrung by concerns about offending other groups on campus and by often unsupportive or nonconfrontational administrations who give cover to these bigoted campaigns under the umbrella of free speech. Most university systems lack standards that protect the rights of all students, including those who are under attack by hostile campaigns. Pro-Israel students also sincerely believe that reaching out with sympathy and understanding for the other side's grievances and engaging in reasonable debate will help defuse the situation. Unfortunately, this has rarely been the result.
Pro-Israel students are also taken aback by the other side's use of half-truths and racist anti-Semitic stereotypes, by their aggressive violation of the usual rules of conduct on campuses, and by some measure of discomfort, intimidation and even outright fear. The 11 MSU students who tried to shout down Ambassador Michael Oren at the University of California, Irvine (UCI), in February violated standards of civil decorum and free speech, and they were arrested. One of those arrested was the president of the MSU at UCI. In the United Kingdom, where, in May, Israel's deputy ambassador was virtually assaulted by a menacing crowd, the constant intimidation has made Israel's supporters there fearful of organizing pro-Israel events. At the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, students placed a Palestinian flag on top of a pro-Israel exhibit. When a Jewish student removed the flag, MSU students physically attacked him.
Editor's note: These are readers' comments on the original article that add information.
The article is good, but does not go far enough. There is still great naivity about what we face.
MSA/MSU and SJP are branches of Muslim Brotherhood. Hamas and al-Qaeda are also branches of Muslim Brotherhood. Need I say more?
The article correctly names many causes of pro-Israel students' weakness. But there are other causes too. All too often pro-Israel students are against each other.
There are those who support peace and negotiations at any price, who are pro-dialogue even when MSA clearly tells them "No dialogue." They openly attack other pro-Israel students. I was told by one such " peace and negotiations" student to go away.
There are also many official Jewish organizations that are very destructive. They view appearance of new pro-Israel organizations as invasion of their turf. They wine and dine university presidents, tell them and everyone else everything is just fine. They are the first to be interviewed by the media, which uses them to create an impression that everything is fine and just a few Jewish and pro-Israel extremists are raking muck.
University administrations are subservient to MSA/MSU and SJP because of carrots and sticks. The carrots are the Islamic Study Centers opening up on their campuses and donations they get from Saudi, Kuwaiti, UAE and other governments, royal families and magnates. The sticks are the subtle threats of violence and semi-violence, which they implicitly understand would take place, should they take disciplinary measures.
They know that MSA members and supporters are many, well organized, and can do anything to them from invading their offices and throwing papers from windows to outright murder. They know that the Muslim Brotherhood ideology is strong enough for those students to sacrifice some of their own, if necessary, to let some of their own go to jail for outright crimes, if those crimes are to help their cause.
The memory of what was done to Daniel Pearl and many others, as well as the rioting that followed the Danish cartoons is in all of our heads. University administrations remember it too, and it is giving them nightmares. Therefore I do not expect them to do anything substantial at all under any circumstances. The 11 arrested at UCI will be released and forgiven.
Physical attack on the Jewish student who removed the Palestinian flag from pro-Israel exhibit at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee is one documented case. How many cases of violence go undocumented. I know of two such cases at UCI. And they are undocumented because university police, under instruction from university administration, refuse to document them. In one case, police actually told a Jewish student assaulted by MSU members that it was all her fault because she is Jewish.
I sit and wait for murder of Jewish students to start. And even that will not change administration's attitude.
MSA/MSU and SJP do not want to perpetuate the conflict. They want to exterminate us. They are sorry Hitler failed and want to finish his job. Let us be clear about it.
What is the solution to all this? Two years ago I thought it would be to "dance on the edge of violence" - to engage in what is euphemistically called "civil disobedience" or "nonviolent resistance."
But now I no longer think this would work. A false, ugly image of Israel is the academic norm of North American education. Moreover, a false, ugly image of the Jew is becoming the norm. I feel American Jews will soon realize they have no place in this country.
Move to Israel, and once there, ignore public opinion and fight like hell. Read Jabotinsky. He has the solutions.
"The philosopher who said 'Homo homini lupus' was a wise man. A man to a man is worse than a wolf, and for a long time we will not be able to do a thing about it, neither by reform from above, nor through acculturation, nor through sad lessons of life. Anyone who trusts a neighbor is a fool, even the kindest, the friendliest neighbor. Anyone who relies on justice is a fool; justice exists only for those who can achieve it through fist and persistence.
"When I hear rebukes for my preaching of separation, mistrust and other tart things, I sometimes feel like answering, Yes, guilty. I have preached and will preach them, because eternal separation, eternal mistrust, eternal 'on guard,' eternal big stick in one's belt is the only method to end up standing on one's feet in this wolfish scuffle."Comments by David Tsal on 5/13/10 at 7:28 am
If you follow the links from the SJP web site or if you follow some of the source they quote in their literature, they will cite other organizations that supposedly are their supporters like Jews for Peace, Jew for Justice in Palestine. Their recent divestment had 2 videos - one from a young woman who claimed to be an Israeli and the other from an older woman who claimed to be a Jewish survivor of Nazi Germany.[Anna Baltzer and Hedy Epstein. Anna Baltzer may be born Jewish but she is a practitioner of ISM tactics; she will make any accusation and say anything to demonize Israel. Hedy spent the war years safely in England, not in a concentration camp.]
Both made pointed comments that they were Jewish supporting divestment & denouncing Israel. If Jewish students on campus are constantly hearing & seeing this type of information, how do you expect them to determine the legitimacy of the claims? Believe the press & media or believe Jewish women who decry supposed inhumane acts on the part of a government?
Comment by Sandi on 5/16/10 at 2:21 pm
Roz Rothstein is co-founder and CEO, StandWithUs.
Roberta R. Seid is StandWithUs director of research and education
StandWithUs is an international Israel education organization that ensures that Israel's side of the story is told on campuses, community, libraries, schools and the media. It hosts speakers and conferences, offers website resources and creates brochures, flyers, posters and materials that are distributed globally.
This article is archived at
http://www.jewishjournal.com/ opinion/article/facing_hatred_on_ campusyou_cant_fight_fire_with_flowers_20100512/
|HOME||May-June 2010 Featured Stories||Background Information||News On The Web|