by Sultan Knish
What happens when you bring a new dog into the house and it makes a mess on your rug or bites you on the leg. The first thing you do is take a rolled up newspaper and thwack it on the nose. Then you say firmly, "Bad Dog."
When it comes to Muslim violence however the West has long ago not only stopped thwacking Muslims on the nose with a newspaper, but doesn't even bother to say, "Bad Dog" anymore.
What if the dog bit one of your kids hard enough to require stitches, and instead of getting rid of it, you instead blamed your own family for not working hard enough to make the dog feel accepted. So while the blood is still running down your kid's leg, you thwack him on the nose, and pet the dog on the head while saying, "Good Dog."
Sure at some point the state might step in, but the problem is that the dog is 1.5 billion Muslims, and you are the state.
Europe is slowly coming around to the idea that Islam must be housebroken, even as America continues insisting that Islam is just great except for a few extremists somewhere who wouldn't have any influence, if we just appeased Muslims more. But Europe's idea of housebreaking still misses the point.
Evicting a few Imams and banning religious clothing from schools certainly won't housebreak Islam. It's the impotent behavior of people who are too afraid to deal with the threat and can't even name the problem.
About the only countries who thwack Islam on the nose anymore are America and Israel, and they do it all too lightly, and hardly say "Bad Dog" anymore. No wonder the house is full of crap, the kids need tetanus shots and the "dog" is running the house.
Nation building ventures have made a dog's dinner of what should have been a simple newspaper thwacking that would have left major holes in the countries that sponsored terrorism. Instead we did the equivalent of trying to build obedience schools, which we had to let the dogs themselves run in the end, while agreeing to try any trainers who thwack too hard in court. No wonder the dogs again wound up having the run of the house.
It's common sense that you can't share a house, a neighborhood or a country with a rabid dog. Either the dog goes, or you do. Between being unable to deliver a simple thwack and birth rate statistics biased toward the four footed clan, it doesn't take a genius to figure out which was this is headed. You either throw the dogs out, housebreak them or learn to live like a dog.
As the riots, murders, gang rapes and bombings across Europe show, a lot of people would rather learn to live like dogs, than stand up to the pack. But that kind of whipped cur attitude isn't limited to Europe. Bush has spent the twilight days of his presidency apologizing for saying "Bad Dog" once too often, after 3000 of his countrymen were brutally murdered. In Israel, as in much of Europe, pointing out that Arab Muslims and terrorism have a propensity to go together is a criminal offense.
Not only can't our governments say "Bad Dog" anymore, even civilians aren't allowed to say it on a freelance basis, let alone deliver a good solid thwack to the nose of the mangy curs. Forget about housebreaking Islam, the way things are going Islam is housebreaking us.
While Europe has gone to the dogs out of fear of the Hounds of Islam, it's worth remembering that old fictional English detective, Sherlock Holmes, and the Hound of the Baskervilles. Holmes investigates a suspicious death supposedly caused by a mysterious haunted creature, the Hound of the Baskervilles. The official verdict is that the Hound does not even exist. Many believe that it exists and is a spectral monster that cannot be stopped. Holmes however shoots the dog and discovers that it is no unstoppable fiend, only a large dog covered in phosphorus.
Islam is not unstoppable. It is not a supernatural unkillable force. It is a large vicious dog covered in phosphorus, glowing in the dark, and terrifying those who might resist its rampage. When you shoot the dog however you discover that it is mortal, and in the process you discover your own strength, and the dog learns once more than men and women are its masters to be obeyed. Because if dogs will not submit to men, then men will be forced to submit to dogs.
These are readers' comments to the article.
Blogger Lemon said...
If a dog bites you once, you send it to obedience school.
Twice and you put it down.
Blogger Tabatha Kaplan said.
Superb analogy :)
I'll digg/stumble etc
In the UK we are all but facing Mecca when we pray. Only this week, a group of politicians cancelled a screening of 'Fitna' because two Muslim groups protested.
At the same time, when I recently attended a lobbying day organised by both Jewish and Christian supporters of Israel, we were shunted into a separate building, instead of being in the House Of Commons as was originally planned.
Why? Because of 'security concerns'.
Translation: fear on the part of the British government that a mob of
furious Muslims and their left-wing henchmen would descend on
Blogger Sultan Knish said...
and of course the more they give in, the worse it will get
Blogger Tabatha Kaplan said...
Yes, absolutely. But the Brits either can't, or won't, absorb this fact.
Melanie Phillips, author of 'Londonistan', has written a great article on this. For anyone who wants to read it, you can link to her articles at http://www.melaniephillips.com
And I recommend 'Londonistan' highly. It's excellent.
Blogger Keli Ata said...
Wonderfully analogy. We've refused to hit the Muslim dog on the nose and say bad dog. Now that dog has become a mangy, uncontrollable feral dog.
Even if we can't domestic the Muslim dog we can at least step up to the plate as show him that WE'RE the Alpha dog.
toda raba for the kind comment on my peace bridge photo:)
Anonymous Anonymous said...
there is a person on savagepolitics.com by the name of polcomm who says Israel is the aggressor and they keep saying Israel invaded lebanon, Israel invaded Gaza...what's funny is that the article is called "No freakin' clue". I just had to laugh.
Anonymous Harbi said...
The Muslim world is seething with a thousand and one real and imagined grievances and resentments against the West. They feel humiliated by the West's accomplishments compared with their own inbred backwardness. They want revenge for the Crusades, colonialism, cartoons, Israel, ice-cream wrappers, Salman Rushdie, science, piggy banks and all the other humiliations that they believe in their paranoid state that the kuffars have deliberately inflicted on them.
To Muslims, all relationships are of dominance/submission.
If they can't be dominant, they sulk, whine and claim victim status to sympathetic bleeding-heart liberals, while secretly nursing their pent-up fury and humiliation.
Once they think they might get the upper hand, the sulking immediately flips into murderous hostility.
So, kuffars, beware the coming Islamageddon. Once Muslims can take
on the West there'll be an orgy of rape, murder, torture and
mutilation that will make the two previous world wars seem like a
family squabble. We need to shove Islam back into its box and nail
the lid down before its too late for all of us.
Anonymous Najistani said...
THE TRIUMPH OF ISLAM - HOW TRIBALISM TRUMPS RATIONALISM AND CIVILISATION.
Viewed rationally, Islam is a non-starter. Its 'Holy' Book consists of half-digested fragments of Judeo-Christian theology, mixed with the bile of hatred, and spewed into the fair face of Christendom from the putrifying guts of a violent, deceitful, plundering pedophile. The Koran is full of historical, scientific and logical errors and even contradicts itself on numerous occasions. Not exactly the work of a Supreme Intellect!
And yet Muslims claim that these demented ramblings and rantings are the literal word of God Almighty, to be treated with utmost respect. They throw enormous tantrums when Korans are left in toilets or returned to libraries with bacon-rashers as bookmarks. In the Islamic paradise of Pakistan, damaging a Koran or insulting The Pedophile are punishable by death.
To understand Islam we need to look at the most primitive organisational state of mankind - Tribalism.
If we regard the Ummah as a tribe, and the Koran, the Pedophile and the Black Meteorite as the tribe's three main totems, we begin to get a better understanding of Islam. A tribe derives its identity and unity by displays of reverence towards supernatural totems, and feels insecure and threatened whenever the power of its totems is weakened, for example by the totems being 'humiliated' or 'polluted' . One of the surest ways of demoralising a tribe has always been to desecrate its totems.
This explains the rage at the Motoons, and the 'hate crime' of the Koran down the toilet. It also explains why the Saudi authorities made such a fuss when they found a Christian in Mecca. The precincts of the Holy Meteorite had been defiled by a najis kaffir.
Tribal culture and psychology are difficult for civilised people to understand. Most parts of Western Europe have not been organised tribally since the Dark Ages, so it's difficult to get inside Muslim mind and understand just how primitive and benighted are the psychological processes that go on there. For example:
- A tribe regards itself as perpetually at war with all other tribes - hence the Muslim worldview of Dar a-Harb in conflict with Dar al-Islam, and Ummah in conflict with Kaffir.
- The property and women of other tribes are there for the taking. Might is right - hence the Jizya, Razzia, white slaving etc which are all justified by the Koran. Tribalism also explains the chants of 'We will take your wives for booty' at the London Motoons demonstration - this is the typical behavior of the stone age savage.
- The ethics of reciprocity (do as you would be done by) only apply within the tribe. Hence the lack of any Golden Rule in Islam. The nearest you get to the Golden Rule in the Koran is desiring for your brother Muslim ('kin-selection') what you desire for yourself - in other words share out the booty equally.
- Loyalty to the tribe is of paramount importance - hence the punishment by death for apostates.
- The tribe must not mingle with other tribes or else it may lose its identity - hence the self-imposed ghettoisation and ethnic cleansing of Kaffirs from the periphery of the ghetto as seen in European cities.
- There is a great desire to destroy or humiliate the totems of other tribes, especially where they have phallic significance - hence the attack on the twin towers, and the plans for the MegaMosque whose minarets will be taller than any Christian building.
Muslims in the modern world are living fossils, though like dinosaurs suddenly set down on the streets of London, none the less dangerous for being so primitive. Islam appeals to the lowest and basest instincts of man, and in the absence of a strong, confident modern culture will gradually reduce its host society to a disfunctional state of anarchy where Islam can gain the upper hand.
Tribalism makes it impossible to defeat Islam by reason or appeals to decency. The Koran, the Pedophile and the Meteorite are not capable of being examined rationally or ethically - they are pre-rational symbols of tribal cohesion. And when that tribe is on a roll , and believes itself to be the strongest and fastest growing tribe winning the Jihad against all the rest, no rational argument will persuade its warriors to abandon the winning side.
Since Mohammedans hate dogs and fear them, comparing them to dogs is a bull's eye. This piece is brilliant.
Thanks, Sultan. I'm still laughing.
Anonymous ito said...
You have made an analogy between muslims and dogs. When will someone decide that they feel insulted by that? :)
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Well, yes and no. The European elite is quite purposefully selling out their countries because they believe they are righting cosmic injustice of European colonization. I think they really believe that letting themselves be counter colonized will restore the balance.
These elites will be genuinely surprised, however, when the "dog" turns and mauls them too.
Anonymous Frankly Opinionated said...
Great Post! I first read it over at "Bare Naked Islam", and made the inserted comment below. I have you bookmarked, and will read much more of your clarity induced writing. Thank You. To see a bit about me, just click on my signature. And now my comment on the post:
The only problem that I find with this post is that it puts dogs in a bad light. My dog stands head and shoulders above these bastards. My dog has manners, and appreciates that I let her in my house, or take her into the house of my friends. And, once inside the house, she is clean, and neat; unlike these people who leave bloody body parts strewn around, smoking hulks of vehicles, and rubble where buildings once stood. My dog licks my face in appreciation, while these people, (using the word loosely here), want to behead me to show their appreciation for being in the house.
Great illustration! Bring on some more of that stuff- Sultan Knish
Blogger P-nut said...
A dog is a noble creature with a beautiful spirit. A Muslim is not. Quit insulting dogs.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Dogs are wonderful and great for humanity with all their great traits. Muslims just the opposite. But as good as dogs are, they crap in the yard. When they do leave a turd, we shovel it up and dump it in the trash and have it taken away by the garbage collector. Islam and Muslims are the crap in our yards, and we need to shovel it/them up, dump them where they belong, and have them taken to the trash heaps and dumps of from where they came.
A 'domesticated' dog is a noble creature whereas this muslim/dog analogy fits the bill perfectly. There are two types of unhinged, undisciplined dogs, those barking and those hunting in packs. The brilliant point of this post is that muslims need a good 'thwack' and told in no uncertain terms that sharia, honor killings, amputations, threats of violence and to kill will not be tolerated, they need to be told that their culture is an abhorrent insult to the intelligence of all civilized human beings...
Contact Sultan Knish at firstname.lastname@example.org.
This essay comes from the Sultan Knish website