by Fjordman

One of the claims presented against Islam-critical writers is that they suffer from paranoia about a secret Islamic conspiracy to Islamize Europe and the Western world. This is of course not true. Nobody ever said that it was secret, at least not entirely so. The long-term goal of Islamic theology is for Islam to be triumphant across the entire world, including Europe and the Western world. This is simply mainstream Islam, as it has existed for centuries; it is not a recent innovation by a few radicals.

Besides, the truth is that far from exaggerating, even critics of Islam can be taken by surprise at the sheer speed of events, and by how quickly many Western leaders are caving in to Islamic pressures.

In Denmark, the writers Helle Merete Brix, Torben Hansen and Lars Hedegaard in 2003 published the book I krigens hus:[1] Islams kolonisering af Vesten ("In the House of War: Islam's Colonization of the West"). According to them, we are now experiencing a third great wave of Jihad, yet another attempt to conquer, colonize and Islamize Europe after Arabs and Turks spent centuries trying to do so before. Predictably, these courageous authors were ridiculed for their warnings, most aggressively by individuals from the political Left.

[Ummah Europa]
The Global Ummah

For instance, Michael Jarlner in the left-wing newspaper Politiken[2] in his review from 2003 dismissed the book as "spiteful." He claimed that the "ravings" of those sounding the alarm against an ongoing Islamization of Europe were "delusions" and "prejudiced paranoia of the worst order."

The conservative columnist Mikael Jalving[3] some years later admitted that he didn't take such allegations about Islamization entirely seriously at first, either. However, he later came to realize that these warnings might be on to something real after all. Many of the problems related to political violence, the burning of schools, kindergartens or cars and rising Islamic threats against free speech were problems that only a brave few warned against some years ago. These problems have now become a daily reality in a number of cities.

In fact, even some allegedly delusional pessimists have underestimated how bad things truly are. Lars Hedegaard, one of the co-authors of I krigens hus, was attacked and nearly killed in his own home in 2013. Moreover, in 2003 these authors did not foresee that because of Islam, Denmark would merely a couple of years later be involved in one if its greatest foreign policy crises since the Second World War.

The Mohammed Cartoons Crisis took place after the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten published some relatively innocent cartoons of Islam's founder Mohammed on September 30, 2005. I was one of the first people outside of Denmark to write about this case in English. Already in October 2005,[4] I was campaigning in support of the paper and free speech on my old blog.

[Burning the Danish flag, 2006]
Burning the Danish flag

Did I understand at this point in time that this was a significant story? Yes. Did I foresee that it would become a big international incident that would cause many deaths, planned terror attacks, assassination attempts and the burning of embassies a few months later? No. What this means is that even a notorious so-called Islamophobe like myself actually underestimated the scale of events.

Between 2013 and 2014, Ahmed Akkari, one of the imams who had been heavily involved in whipping up international Islamic hatred against Denmark during the cartoons crisis, decided to switch sides and apologize for his previous actions. In a book published in 2014, Akkari revealed[5] that a Danish delegation of imams had secretly met with the Islamic terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah in the Middle East in the autumn of 2005, in order to draw attention to the Mohammed cartoons and utilize them for their own purposes.

Akkari further admitted[6] that he and many other Muslims were very happy over the mass-murdering Jihadist attacks of September 11, 2001. I was living in Egypt and that time and had myself seen celebrations among local Muslims there. However, Ahmed Akkari talks about 9/11 celebrations that he witnessed first-hand — among Muslims living in Scandinavia and the Western world, not in Saudi Arabia, Iran or Pakistan.

Overall, Ahmed Akkari confirms virtually everything that so-called Islamophobes have been saying for years: That some Muslims speak with two tongues, that many Muslim leaders seek to infiltrate our institutions and Islamize our nations and that far too many Muslims quietly despise the non-Muslim countries in which they have freely chosen to settle. They also seek to silence critics of Islam, one way or another.

The author, editor and free speech activist Lars Hedegaard was assaulted in his own home in Copenhagen on February 5 2013. He survived because his assassin missed with the first shot against his head, fired from the range of one meter, and because the 70-year-old Hedegaard fought back against his much younger would be-murderer. The gun jammed[7] during this life-and-death struggle, preventing further shots, before the assailant fled on foot. "It comes as a surprise[8] that I should be shot at, but apparently I should be," Hedegaard stated at the time.

In late April 2014, a 26-year-old Muslim man with Danish citizenship was arrested in Turkey, suspected of having carried out the assassination attempt on Hedegaard. The suspect has studied engineering[9] in Denmark and was described as a moderate Muslim. However, according to press reports, he was also connected to extremist Islamic circles[10] in Denmark and Sweden and has probably taken part in the fighting in Syria. It should be pointed out that this man has not yet been convicted of anything. However, his life's story is nevertheless interesting. This is an educated man described as well integrated, who nevertheless developed ties to radical Islamic groups.

It is sometimes suggested in the media that Islamic radicalism is caused by ignorance and poverty, and can be cured by more education. The problem with this Marxist-inspired theory is that it is not based in facts. A number of different studies clearly demonstrate that militant Muslims often have at least average income and above average education.

Mohamed Atta was a Jihadist terrorist who crashed American Airlines Flight 11 into the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11 2001. He was the university-educated son[11] of a lawyer who also lived and studied for several years in Hamburg, Germany. Yet his Western-style education taught him how to use Western technology to kill Western non-Muslims more efficiently.

[WTC/9-11 shirt]
Man wearing shirt depicting World Trade Center disaster

I once attended a lecture and debate with Morten Storm[12] from Denmark, who had converted to Islam and then some years later left the religion behind. He currently lives with credible death threats because of this. However, during those years when he was a genuine Muslim, he became a hard-line militant Muslim who enjoyed friendly relations with Jihadists and terrorist groups.

When explaining how he went from being just a regular Muslim to a radical and militant Muslim, Morten Storm gave a simple answer: He studied the Koran and took it seriously. He became more and more militant and hateful because he honestly adopted militant and hateful texts as his guide. His view was that Islamic texts and teachings are hateful and violent at their core. Storm therefore argued that you could become more hateful and violent if you study Islam and take it seriously, not less.

What we are dealing with in the West is unfounded optimism. Supposedly smart people say that we should be optimistic, and that the problems we are currently seeing will somehow "work themselves out." Optimism can be good in certain ways, but it can also be dangerous when it is totally misplaced. In that case, it prevents you from dealing properly with real problems. For example, a striking number of people in positions of power in the Western world today seem to assume that the many Muslims we keep importing will adjust to our culture and become "less Islamic" over time. Yet available evidence currently indicates the exact opposite.

There are plenty of examples where young immigrants of the second or third generation are more Islamic and more aggressively hostile to native Europeans and their culture than were the immigrants who first arrived here. Some of them go abroad to fight Jihad in places such as Syria.

[Demo in support of Hezbollah, London]</p>

Occasionally, they will be joined there by white converts to Islam. Young Europeans have been taught to be at best indifferent towards their nation and their cultural heritage, at worst to actively despise it. It should hardly be surprising that some of them then choose to be proud of somebody else's culture, when they are systematically prevented from being proud of their own. For the same reason, it is unclear why young immigrants should want to assimilate into our culture. After all, large parts of our media and academia keep telling them that our culture us evil, racist, oppressive and spiritually empty. Who wants to be a part of something like that?

Besides, the sheer number of immigrants, also non-Muslim immigrants, is now far too large to be assimilated in any meaningful way. What we are witnessing is a de facto fragmentation of our societies along religious, ethnic, racial and cultural lines.

[Muslims in Norway]
Muslims in Norway

The first Muslim immigrants who came here had to keep a lower profile because they were few. Now there are so many of them that they can establish parallel Islamic communities in the West, in effect colonizing our countries. That is precisely what is happening. Modern communications technology has made it easier than ever to stay in touch with their ancestral homeland, by email or satellite TV, as if they never left home. It is perfectly possible to use intercontinental flights to pick up a bride from Pakistan and bring her to Berlin or London.

More women in European cities wear the veil now than twenty years ago. I have even seen face-veils or full-blown burkas. This was unheard of just a few years ago, but not anymore. Once more, we can see that reality is worse than what many pessimists predicted a generation or two ago. A few foresighted observes did warn against this, but they were either vilified, ridiculed or just plain ignored.

Niqabs worn in London
Niqabs worn in London

At the Gatestone Institute, the writer Soeren Kern carefully tracks the ongoing Islamic infiltration of Western nations, from Spain and Italy to France and Belgium. A complex plan by hard-line Muslims in Britain[13] to infiltrate and Islamize public schools has been uncovered. Militant Muslims who promote sharia laws are trying to do the same in other countries, for instance in Germany.[14] Again, this is something that is taking place now, not in some dark and distant future.

In the early hours of May 19 2014, a hand grenade[15] exploded in Malmö, Sweden's third largest city, destroying many cars and smashing windows in nearby buildings. This was the fifth case involving hand grenades in Malmö alone in the first five months of 2014. Raza Arnaut stated to the local newspaper that she fell out of her bed due to the powerful explosion outside of her flat. She is now scared and wants to move. The situation has been deteriorating steadily for years, she warns. With the latest rounds of explosive attacks, "This was[16] just like during the war in Bosnia" in the 1990s, which she once fled from. Apparently, an armed conflict of sorts is brewing in parts of Sweden, too. This is Scandinavia, today.

At the same time in Gothenburg,[17] Sweden's second largest city, a man was shot dead in the 20th shooting incident in the city so far this year. In the capital city of Stockholm, people fear that the massive immigrant riots[18] of May 2013 could return at any moment. The underlying problems have not been resolved.

[Riots and arson in Husby]
Riots and arson in Husby

Several other Western European cities such as Paris and London have experienced large-scale riots. In Marseille,[19] France, the level of street crime and gang fighting has become so bad that Socialist politicians with an immigrant background want the army to be sent in, to reestablish some semblance of law and order. The authorities lost effective control over hundreds of areas in France years ago. In May 2014, it was announced that Chinese police[20] would help patrol tourist destinations in Paris after a rise in muggings and attacks on Chinese tourists.

Meanwhile, the waves of illegal immigration into Europe from the south and east, especially from Africa and the Islamic world, keep increasing on a nearly monthly basis in 2014. It is worse than the year before, and the year before that. These huge migration waves show no sign of slowing down. On the contrary, the unsustainable population of many African and Muslim countries continues to grow, at the same time as European countries have nearly abandoned effective border controls because of the EU. Thanks to a myriad of human rights conventions and pressure groups, immigrants who have managed to get here illegally can often not be deported.


People smuggling has grown into a major global industry. The author Torben Snarup Hansen[21] warns that hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants from Africa and the Middle East are currently waiting to enter, by any means necessary. This number shows no sign of declining. On the contrary, it keeps increasing as the population of Africa and the Islamic world keeps rising. The influx of migrants across Mediterranean has reached "Biblical[22] proportions," Italy's navy chief warned. Hansen fears that Europe's future existence could be on the line.

Europe's share of the world's population has never been lower in historical times, and still it keeps shrinking. Europe has already been demographically eclipsed by Africa, and is in the process of being economically eclipsed by Asia. Native Europeans are rapidly losing their homelands and the ability to shape their own destinies. To continue mass immigration and open border-policies as before in such a situation is sheer madness. It constitutes a massive betrayal of future generations of Europeans to dump future social and ethnic conflicts on them. We have an obligation to do whatever damage limitation we can, if nothing else.

Sometimes we can experience surprising or shocking events, as Breivik's attacks in Norway in 2011 reminded us. However, this event probably did not have much effect on the long lines of history.

Looking back on the past decade, I see one positive major trend and one negative major trend. The good news is that opposition to the dissolution of Western nations is growing. Ten years after Theo van Gogh was murdered in Amsterdam for mocking Islam, the Islam-critic Geert Wilders is heading one of the largest political parties in the Netherlands. Opposition to the totalitarian and repressive aspects of the EU is mounting among regular voters. A rising number of native Europeans are rebelling against the cultural elites. Many young Europeans are fed-up with facing harassment from aggressive criminal gangs in the streets, and afterwards being called "racists" by the Establishment if they do not want more hostile immigrants let into the country. This offers a glimmer of hope for the future.

On the negative side, however, mass immigration and Islamization continues as before. Ideological censorship is by some standards getting worse. So is the ongoing social decay of what was once called Western civilization.

Apart from a few brave souls, Hardly anybody publicly predicted in the 1970s or 1980s that a significant number of Western intellectuals and artists would soon have to live with daily police protection. This is now a reality. Even in Scandinavia, several artists live as virtual prisoners in their own homes, simply because they made some drawings of a man who may or may not have lived in the seventh century. In the worst-hit Scandinavian cities, attacks in public areas with hand grenades have become an established fact. This rivals or exceeds what many so-called racists predicted several decades ago, yet this is now happening.

If we look back at the past two generations, many of the warnings that were sounded years ago have turned out to be accurate. Some were even understated. I was naïve myself about some of these issues as late as in the 1990s. I simply did not realize the full scale of the demographic and cultural transformation that was underway. I'm not proud of it, but I was stupid. I believed what I had been taught in school and by the mass media.

However, there is a limit to how stupid you are allowed to be. The problems are now so big that they are impossible for anybody to ignore. They are all around us to see, for anybody with eyes. Time is running out. It is no longer credible or acceptable for people in positions of power to claim that they "didn't know."

It is deeply irresponsible, and a massive betrayal of future generations of Europeans, to continue failed policies of mass immigration and open borders in the hope that they will "turn out well in the end." This constitutes a gigantic social experiment on an entire continent and an entire civilization. It needs to end.




















[19] calls-for-army-to-be-deployed-to-tackle-gang-warfare.html



[22] Italys-navy-chief-warns-criminal-gangs-wreak-havoc-high-seas.html "


These are some of the comments that added useful information.


Stand back and look at the big picture. It is not so much the muslims who are determined to islamise europe as our own leaders, although the muslims are quite happy to oblige. Any country that joins the EU is immediately flooded with third world, mainly muslim immigrants. The elites in formerly mature, rational societies have pounded their native citizens into accepting the unacceptable with stalinist imposed political correctness and anti racist propaganda. Immigrant crimes, cultural problems are routinely covered up by all sections of the media. Occasionally some minor celebrity is thrown to the wolves as an example to lesser mortals. All the time the relentless, suicidal rates of immigration continue, not the least in financial terms, never mind cultural ! Just about every western nation is functionally bankrupt, having national debt levels that can never be paid back, and that are being added to with annual deficits which are insane and unsustainable. Then there's the double standards in employment law and free speech which discriminate savagely against the host population. All flying in the face of all common sense and reason.

In the middle east, stable, if not desirable (to live in), functioning states have been toppled one after the other by terrorists sponsored by the US/EU/Saudi Arabia. This has been pursued with Messianic zeal, just look at the hassle Putin is getting for throwing a spanner in the works in Syria!

Why would NATO be flying bombing missions in support of cruel and sadistic religious fanatics in Libya, and Syria (if they had gotten away with it) supporting groups that are far more evil than the regimes they are replacing. Why would NATO bomb Serbia into submission, establishing a muslim foothold in southern europe?

And all this supported and sustained by an endless web of lies perpetrated and kept in place by all levels of government and media, with any dissent immediately denounced and stamped on with the full force of the political, judicial and media establishment, working to the full extent (and often overstepping) the limit of their powers.

Why ?, why is all this happening? Have all of our leaders collectively taken leave of their senses ? — or are they working towards a purpose?

For my money they are!

My best guess is that islam is their tool to control the world, it brooks no opposition, has no compunction in murdering dissenters and is the perfect tool of oppression. Of course it will not apply to the elite any more than it applies to the house of Saud when they cavort around London.

I don't really think that this will all end peaceably. Our youth can be as resentful as they want, they will just be beaten down with the blunt stick of state. Prominent dissenters will continue to have their occasional victory in the courts, but only at the expense of much emotional and financial capital, but it won't stop anything — or even stall it, it's been going on, and accelerating for over forty years now in the face of varying degrees of public opposition and disquiet, and regardless of any change of government. We are never going to win the argument with these people because they are working to an agenda that they are determined to carry out, and they are prepared to go to ANY lengths to achieve it. They actually perceive the rest of the human race as we do livestock or lab rats.

I don't think this will end pretty!


"My best guess is that islam is their tool to control the world, it brooks no opposition, has no compunction in murdering dissenters and is the perfect tool of oppression. Of course it will not apply to the elite any more than it applies to the house of Saud when they cavort around London."

This is the thesis I have been propounding for some years. It builds on Bat Ye'or's expose of Eurabia and the universal Caliphate.

I'm no expert in global energy supplies, but plenty of people believe that oil is going to run out, probably this century. As it runs out, it will become prohibitively expensive, and many, many parts of the modern world will become impossible to maintain or advance. The elite are not going to want to have democracy when this happens. They have seen the Bolshevik revolution, and no doubt fear something like this happening again. So, the best way to make a population compliant and anti-democracy is to islamise them.

Between Roberto Michels' "Political Parties" (1911) and C.Wright Mills' "The Power Elite" (1957) leftwing activists understood the existence and mechanisms of the political elite. And as we have seen from communist countries, there is always a power elite.

The rest of the population are being kept in ignorance, and are being led like sheep. Even many of those who were involved in the counter-jihad movement before I was, are absolutely loathe to consider the idea that the elite are not ignorant about islam, but are willfully transforming these societies.

To me the most obvious reason for them to do this is that they want the west to be anti-democracy by the time oil is being rationed to the rich and powerful.


Of course muslims dread anti-shariah, anti-quran, anti-stupidity, anti-sheeple people. Islam has spread through its excellent way of mesmerizing sheeple and by throwing a spell upon them. Allah is the greatest deceiver, so they imitate allah. Therefore they hate anyone who awakens the sheeple to the danger.

Is lack of faith/religion, lack of values in the west the main reason for the sheeple to surrender and not resist, and act like dhimmis/servants of allah's servants. For EU liars to be servants of allah's servants is the highest honor and values, in the case of having no values at all.

occupant 9

Certainly there are bureaucrats who had large charts drawn up in order to project what mass immigration of hostiles would mean to the regular citizen, and they were completely comfortable with it. Can diehard multiculturalists be so diabolical as to willingly destroy their own nation? Of course, because that's the entire point of multiculturalism.

If not treason, we are witnessing a stupefying negligence on an order that exceeds previous historical attempts at stupidity, in any age, by any group of people supposedly charged with maintaining the security of the nation they are part of.


Quoting What we are dealing with in the West is unfounded optimism. Supposedly smart people say that we should be optimistic, and that the problems we are currently seeing will somehow "work themselves out."

Another form of this unfounded optimism is the belief that the problem of Islam is relatively stable and will not lurch metastatically worse in the coming decades, as though the jihad Muslims pursue is just a statistical sociological factor like the numbers of burglaries or heart attack fatalities over a period of time. Such a view is maintained only by ignoring key aspects of jihad — including its history of militantly expansionist supremacism, with the impetus and desideratum of a Koran-scripted and Sunna-blueprinted Lebensraum and a Drang nach Westen that make Hitler's pale in comparison.

The Dutch Patriot on

I prefer Samuel Huntington over Francis [Fukuyama] anyway. The analyses of the current state of the world was given by Samuel. Not Francis.

As always there is a follow the money component. I cant see any benefit by taking in so many immigrants. The ones who profit from it are: 1)Left wing politicians and their voters.. 2)The ones who want to bring down the price of labour in any shape or form. 3) The ones that provide legal and social "aid" to immigrants.Call them the immigration industrial complex.

All the others are the losers...The first group is bigger and therefore will always win a "free and honoust" election.

We should change the rules of the democratic game. No more voting for those who dont pay. Taking in immigrants should be a matter for the left. But not by voting. Let them house them. Let them protect and feed them.

I am from the Netherlands. This country is full. There is no work. There is no clean environment and there is no protection from islam. Stay there! Sort out your own problems. I just dont care about your Syrian islam [ordure].


I wonder what the reaction would be if we stopped sounding 'anti-islam' and started telling people sweetly: "you know, it's going to be lovely with all this spiritual growth through islam. In 20 years your daughter will wear a hijab and your son will go to mosque. Islam will be the majority religion then, like in Lebanon. Islam works really beautifully, totally the religion of peace, if people just go along with it nicely. And as for the security: Saudi Arabians are really happy that serious punishments are meted out to thieves." Hm, I can't say it without sounding sarcastic.


"Why would NATO be flying bombing missions ..."

Why did NATO replace shah of Iran with fundamental islamists? The same in Iraq, Libya, ... They claim to save the people from their own rulers? A noble virtue but false. Only western people believe such big lies. Actually these bombing were/ are done to distract western people from their own misery: one of them being the huge national debt that at some point will cause a collapse so huge as to cause horrible wars. Every president comes just gets elected, adds a few trillion more debt and get a library named after him and gets acquaint ed with Arab and Muslims tycoons, and facilitates the invasion of western universities. And digs a few more nails in the nation's coffin. Then he/she is remembered for being the best charismatic president/PM.


I absolutely agree with almost everything you say except these actions aren't being carried out to distract the people of the west, in fact they are barely reported on. If you asked a thousand people in the west I'd be willing to bet that the number of people who know that NATO flew bombing missions in support of Libyan 'rebels' would be in single figures. The western media don't need conflict to distract their citizens. Manchester United, The New York Yankees, Kim Kardashian, Simon Cowel, Coronation Street ........ are far more effective.

The average person has no idea of the wests roll in the destabilisation of these countries. What we DO get is endless propaganda against the head of the target state, I mean we all know that Mubarak/Gadaffi/Assad/Hussain are/were brutal dictators who MUST be overthrown for the sake of their people — our media tells us so.

We all know that the beheading, summary executing, crucifying 'dissidents' are peaceful democrats who will lead their countries to a new era of peace, freedom and prosperity (with a little help from the CIA, IMF, EU and Joe Biden, if he can spare any more offspring to help out), don't we, ? — our media tells us so. And of course we all KNOW, for sure that Putin is a corrupt brutal dictator who is just itching for an excuse to roll his tanks right across europe — to the shores of the English Channel — unless our peace loving 'democracy' supporting, noble, caring sharing leaders stop him — our media tells us so!, why, he's the next Hitler, Prince Charles tells us — lot of competition for that job according to our media.

OH, and he organized lousy Olympics.

NO, they don't distract us with these conflicts, they do as much as they can to keep us in the dark about them, apart from demonising the target in the media to such an extent that anyone who is against our interference HAS to preface their objections with ' LOOK, we all know Assad/Putin/Hussain/Mubarak is a corrupt/brutal dictator, but......' So successful is western media propaganda.


"the Islam-critic Geert Wilders is heading one of the largest political parties in the Netherlands. Opposition to the totalitarian and repressive aspects of the EU is mounting among regular voters. A rising number of native Europeans are rebelling against the cultural elites. Many young Europeans are fed-up with facing harassment from aggressive criminal gangs in the streets"

Geert Wilders' party is set to lose 2 seats in the EU parliament after this election(based on exit polls, according to some news outlets). Most native Europeans don't live around the problem(it will reach them eventually, with the immigration numbers and their birth rates there won't be places left to white flight to), if they do, the smart ones white flight/move, the ones who don't segregate themselves or get dumbed down and become like the immigrants.

The human species is a resilient one, especially when we're being fed propaganda. Most people will think the changes happening to their country are normal, and will adapt, for the worse. Large amounts of crime will become normal, immigration/globalization will be seen as something that can't be stopped, etc. The remaining intelligent natives who know what's going on aren't going to rise up, they're going to think short-term and going to care more about things like whether they can afford that next car or trying to decide which movie to go see at the theater. I'm guilty of this, if a civil war broke out or mass protest/civil unrest like Egypt/Ukraine happened, I wouldn't fight, I'd be scared [to the point of voiding excrement] of both dieing or losing material possessions/economic prosperity.

We aren't going to win our countries with elections, whoever wins elections is based on who the media/people with money supports and the people already ruling our countries support, elections have nothing to do with policies. Maybe we'd have a chance if parties started campaigning for a referendum on immigration, if not, we've lost.

I mentioned Geert's party losing seats, but other similar parties are set to make huge gains, like the French FN or UKIP. Even if a party like UKIP wins though, what exactly are they gunna do? They can't just say "alright, the borders are closed, we leave the EU, and the country is for the natives again" unless they get an absolute majority(that's if they even wanted to, I wouldn't be surprised if UKIP's real goal is just to get rid of EU migration so more space opens up for further third world immigration) which won't happen because parties are elected on multiple issues. Even if they did, the policies could be revoked after the next election if another party wins on some other unrelated issue like the economy. This is why there has to be a referendum on this specific issue. Also, what happened to UKIP's policy of freezing immigration if they get elected in the last campaign? They had to drop that policy so the media would even spend a second talking about them.

If I'm honest, the only way I see us getting our countries back is via military coup, and our militaries are about as brainwashed as Europeans get. American soldiers even believe running around Afghanistan killing a bunch of insignificant Taliban or protecting road construction projects is fighting for America's freedom. What a joke. Atleast Egypt and Thailand have militaries that care about THEIR own people.

Who cares about us though, we're only 8% of the world's population(compared to 30% in the early 1900s, talk about responsible breeding), and we were behind colonialism, slavery, etc. Maybe we deserve to be removed from the earth. We aren't being killed, so it's really not that bad of a genocide compared to others, it's more akin to Tibet than Rwanda(although liberals still hate what's happening in Tibet, oddly not here). Plus, why should we get to live with our own people? Why should Europeans be prosperous when others have to deal with poverty, lack of food, and people killing eachother? We won't be a huge loss to the world, the world will still have Japan/Korea/north-east China to lead the world forward in technological advancement/innovation, and to take us to that Mars colony.

Farewell Europa... We had a good run, going back to Sumeria/Indus Valley/ancient Egypt if you want to believe the theories that people who stayed in Europe during the ice age(in refuges not covered in ice) migrated south after the ice melted to dominate the inhabitants there and start civilization(based on accounts in their scripture, King Tut's DNA being R1b, Sumerian statues with blue eyes, Egyptian ruling elite mummies with blonde, red and brown hair), if not, then ancient Greece, still a good run.

Michael Copeland

The reason for this massive transformation?
We intend to de-homogenise the nation.
Just promote the lying claim
It's all for "economic" aim,
When we know it's really planned disintegration.

We'll blacken and demean the native race,
And drive established peoples out of place.
Turn them into refugees,
Pack new voters in with ease,
And force the change to run at quite a pace.

Plant these new invaders in their town,
And make the native culture swiftly drown,
Let them infiltrate the schools,
And then impose their foreign rules,
To drive the local standards ever down.

We won't let peoples' borders be controlled,
We'll make them do exactly what they're told,
Use police at our behest,
So no dissent can be expressed.
Then bend the rules to help the plan unfold.

Give them mass invasion by migration,
A demographic gross manipulation.
Keep the project under wraps,
Ensure the old traditions lapse.
And then be rich with self-congratulation.


It is not even the arm chair liberals who are due the greatest blame here; the problems started long, long before with the French, English and Belgian colonisation of Africa (to name a few!)

The French government for instance was stupid enough to give everyone they conquered French passports, amongst which were circa 8.5 million muslims who can now go and do whatever they please wherever they please.

As icing on the 'muslim cake', these governments also send monthly checks to their extended families in Morocco, Egypt and everywhere else.

And in this fashion we help pay for the islamisation of Europe.

Pretty neat heh?

Fjordman is a Norway-based writer. He is a noted blogger who writes analytic and original essays on Islam, Scandinavian affairs and global politics. He is a frequent contributor to Brussels Journal, Gates of Vienna, Faith Freedom International, Jihad Watch and Think-Israel, among other websites. This article appeared May 23, 2014 in Gates of Vienna. It is archived at For a complete archive of Fjordman's writings, see the multi-index listing in the Fjordman Files.

Return _________________________End of Story___________________________ Return