by Guy Millière, December 21, 2017


For many years, "Palestine" has not stopped aspiring to new heights in the so called[1] "international community". "Palestine" has been present at the Olympic Games since 1996, and, later, became a permanent observer to UNESCO and the United Nations. The vast majority of the 95 "embassies" of "Palestine" are in the Muslim world; many others are in Asia, Africa, Latin America and Europe. In 2014, the Spanish Parliament voted[2] in favor of full recognition of "Palestine." A few weeks later, the French Parliament[3] did the same.

There is no other instance in the history of the world where a state that does not exist can have missions and embassies presumed to function as if that state did exist.

Now the time has probably come for the "Palestinians" to realize that they have lost and fall back to earth, as noted by the scholar Daniel Pipes.[4]

Have "Palestinian" leaders been showing by their speeches and actions that they are ready to rule a state living in peace with their neighbors and with the rest of the world? All "Palestinian" leaders have incessantly incited[5] terrorism, and do not hide their wish to wipe[6] Israel off the map.

Is there a long-standing aspiration by the "Palestinian people" to have a state and to live peacefully within that state? The answer is actually no. The "Palestinian people" were invented[7] in the late 1960s by the Arab and Soviet propaganda[8] services. As PLO leader Zuheir Mohsen told the Dutch newspaper Trouw in March 1977:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality, today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese."

Reports[9] from the West Bank after the Six Day War show that the Arabs defined themselves in interviews as "Arabs" or "Jordanians"; they evidently did not know that they were the "Palestinian people". Since then, they were taught it. They were also taught that it is their duty to "liberate Palestine"[10] by killing Jews. The Palestinians are the first people invented to serve as a weapon of mass destruction of another people.

Yasser Arafat, Chairman of the PLO, at the Arab League summit in Rabat, Morocco, 1974. (Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

Is there at least a historic past that gives legitimacy to the aspiration to create a "Palestinian state"? The answer again is actually no. There is no Palestinian culture distinct from the cultures of the Muslim Arab world, no monument that can be defined as a "Palestinian" historic monument, except by falsifying[11] history.

More basically, would a hypothetical "Palestinian state" be economically viable? Again, the answer is actually no. Territories occupied by the Palestinian movements survive only thanks to international financial assistance[12] from the West.

How then could so many countries wish for so long to create a state whose rulers would likely be regressive, corrupt "Palestinian" leaders; whose inhabitants would be used as killing machines, whose history is non-existent-to-falsified and whose economic potential seems zero?

The answer is simple.

Behind their support for the creation of a "Palestinian state", those countries have been pursuing other goals. For decades, countries of the Muslim world obsessively wanted one thing: the destruction of Israel.

They tried to reach their goal through conventional warfare,[13] then terrorism,[14] then diplomacy,[15] then propaganda. They blamed only Israel for all the evils of the Middle East.

All the while, they know who the "Palestinian" leaders are and what they do. They know that the "Palestinian people" were invented. They know why the "Palestinian" people were invented. They know that a "Palestinian state" will not have a viable economy. Yet they have been committed to a strategy[16] of destabilizing and demonizing a non-Muslim nation, Israel.

They call the "Palestinians" "victims"[17]; terrorism, "militancy"; and incitement to kill, "resisting occupation". They have been trampling rightful history and replacing it with myth.

They press "Palestinian" leaders to "negotiate", knowing perfectly well that no agreement will ever be signed and that negotiations will end in bloodshed.

They propose only "peace plans"[18] they know Israel must reject — those which include the "'49 'Auschwitz'[19] armistice lines" or the "right of return"[20] for "Palestinian refugees", who numbered half a million in 1949, but near five million today.

They recognize a "Palestinian state" while knowing that the "state" they recognize is not a state, but rather a terrorist entity[21] without defined borders or territory, and imbued with a will to spill more blood and create more mayhem.

They have relied on turmoil, blackmail and lies to encourage the rest of the world to think the situation requires drastic international intervention.

They have been saying they want a "Palestinian state", but never that they want this state to renounce terrorism and end the conflict.

Instead, they have been waging a vicious war they have long hoped to win.

For more than thirty years, they benefited from the support of the Soviet Union. It financed wars (1967,[22] 1973[23]), terrorism, diplomacy and propaganda. The Soviet Union made the "Palestinian" enterprise an "anti-imperialist" cause[24] -- a means of strengthening Soviet positions and galvanizing the enemies of the West. The Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, but the effects of its support for the "Palestinian cause" for a time remained. Many countries hostile to the West still support and recognize the "Palestinians" while pretending to ignore that they are recognizing a terrorist entity. They are contributing to war.

Countries of the Western world, subjected to the pressures of the Muslim world and the Soviet Union for many years, have gradually given way, some even before any pressure was applied.

France chose its camp in 1967, when General Charles de Gaulle launched what he called an "Arab policy"[25] after its defeat in Algeria. French foreign policy become resolutely "pro-Palestinian" -— in an apparent effort to deflect terrorism, obtain inexpensive oil and compete with the US -- and has remained so to this day. Western European countries[26] have gradually adopted positions close to those of France. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the European Union has become the main financier[27] of the "Palestinian cause", including its terrorism.[28] Western European leaders know what the real goals are, yet they repeat without respite that creating a "Palestinian state" is "essential".[29] They are also contributing to war.

Although a long-time ally of Israel, the United States changed its Middle East policy in the beginning of the 1990s to positions closer[30] to those of the Muslim world. American politicians and diplomats pressured Israelis to negotiate with "Palestinian" leaders and seemed to have lost sight of what the "Palestinian cause" was secretly about. Wishful Israeli leaders agreed to negotiate. The tragic result was the Oslo Accords[31] and the creation of the Palestinian Authority (PA). It quickly became a new base of anti-Israeli terrorism.[32] A wave of lethal, anti-Israel attacks started immediately, with a stepped-up anti-Israel diplomatic and propaganda offensive right after. A "two-state solution" was invoked. American leaders, as if they had slept through several years, started to say that a "Palestinian state" had to exist. Three American Presidents proposed "peace plans",[33] also contributing to war.

An additional "peace plan" is expected soon, but the parameters will be profoundly different.[34] President Donald Trump appears to wish to break with the past.

He recently told Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas that "Palestinian" leaders were liars.[35] None of the American negotiators he chose seems to have the slightest illusion about the "Palestinian" leadership or the "Palestinian cause".

The Taylor Force Act,[36] passed on December 5 by the US House of Representatives, plans to condition US aid to the "West Bank and Gaza" on "the actions taken by the Palestinian Authority to end violence and terrorism against Israeli citizens"; the Act could be adopted soon by the Senate. The PA rejected[37] all the requirements in the Act.

The Muslim world is also undergoing change. Iran, strengthened enormously by the agreement[38] passed in July 2015 and the massive US funding that accompanied it, has been showing its desire to become a hegemonic power in the Middle East. The mullahs' regime now holds three capital cities[39] in addition to Teheran: Baghdad, Damascus, and Beirut. Iran attacks[40] Saudi Arabia and supports the war led by the Houthi militia[41] in Yemen; it intends to seize Sanaa and take control of Bab El Mandeb, the gateway to the Red Sea and the Suez Canal. Qatar and Turkey have established close ties with Iran.

Saudi leaders appear aware of the danger. King Salman chose his son, Mohamed bin Salman,[42] as heir to the throne, and gave him broad powers. "MBS", as he is known, seems intent on leading a real revolution.[43] Militarily, he is head of the 40-member Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition,[44] and has declared his desire to "end terrorism". Economically, he is in charge of an ambitious reform project aimed at making his country less dependent on oil: Saudi Vision 2030.[45] All Saudi leaders[46] in disagreement with the new orientations of the country were placed under arrest and their assets confiscated. Mohamed bin Salman has identified Iran as the main enemy, and recently described its Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, as a "new Hitler."[47] Qatar and Turkey have been subjected to intense Saudi pressure to distance themselves from the Iranian regime. The grand mufti of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Abdulaziz ibn Abdullah Al ash-Sheikh, recently issued a fatwa[48] saying that "fighting the Jews" is "against the will" of Allah and that Hamas is a terrorist organization.

Mohamed bin Salman has the support[49] of the Trump administration; Vladimir Putin[50] who, while being allied to Iran, may want a balance of power in the Middle East, and Xi Jinping,[51] who is facing the risk of a Sunni Islamic upheaval in China's autonomous territory, Xinjiang.

"Palestinian" leader, Mahmoud Abbas was reportedly summoned[52] to Riyadh, where King Salman and Mohammed bin Salman told him that he had to accept the plan proposed by the Trump administration or resign, and that it would "risky" for him to consider launching an uprising — which he has anyway, although being careful to keep it lukewarm.

During the month of October, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, a close ally of Mohamed bin Salman, invited[53] the leaders of the Palestinian Authority and Hamas to come to Cairo for a "reconciliation". He apparently demanded control of the Gaza Strip to be handed to the Palestinian Authority. It also seems[54] that the Trump administration and President Sisi told Hamas leaders that they had to approve the terms of the "reconciliation" agreement, and that if they carried out any attacks against Israel, they risked complete destruction.[55]

The "peace plan" evidently to be presented by the Trump administration is provoking the extreme anger[56] of "Palestinian" leaders. The goal[57] of the "plan" seems to be to revive an open ended "peace process", allowing Saudi Arabia and the members of the Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition to move closer to Israel and push the "Palestinian cause" toward the back burner.

On November 19, an Arab League emergency meeting[58] held in Cairo strongly condemned Hezbollah and Iran. Moreover, for the first time in fifty years, a meeting of the Arab League did not even mention the "Palestinian" question.

President Trump's recognition[59] on December 6 of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel has led to restlessness and acrimony both in the Muslim world[60] and among Western European leaders.[61] Sunni leaders allied to Saudi Arabia, however, as well as Saudi Arabia itself, seem too concerned about the Iranian threat[62] to quarrel with Israel, the United States or really anyone. Western Europe has almost no weight[63] in what is taking shape; all it has shown is cowardice, fear, and continued contempt for a fellow Western democracy: Israel.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, now in the twelfth year of his four year term -- and apparently seeing that he is getting little support -- appeared to seek divine intervention: he asked the Pope[64] for help. There would be "no Palestinian state without East Jerusalem as its capital," Abbas said.[65] He sounded as if he had begun to understand that the "Palestinian cause" could be fading, and, with other "Palestinian" leaders, called for "three days of rage".[66] A few protesters burned tires and American flags — the usual.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan called on the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to convene in Istanbul on December 13, and urged[67] leaders of Muslim countries to recognize Jerusalem as the "occupied capital of the Palestinian state". Saudi King Salman stayed well away as did almost all other Sunni leaders. He only sent a message[68] saying that he calls for "a political solution to resolve regional crises". He added that "Palestinians have right to East Jerusalem" — the least he could do; he did no more. Erdogan is mainly supported[69] by Iran, today's foremost enemy of Saudi Arabia and other Sunni countries.

"It will not be the end of the war against Israel," said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, "but it could be the beginning of the end of the "Palestinian cause".

It now seems a good time for Western European leaders who still blindly support the "Palestinian cause" to cut their losses, both politically and economically. Taking the side of Erdogan and the mullahs in order to support a terrorist entity that will never be a "state" will do nothing to help them fight either terrorism or the increasing Islamization[70] of Europe.








































































Dr. Guy Millière, a professor at the University of Paris, is the author of 27 books on France and Europe. This article was published on the Gatestone Institute website December 21, 2017 and is archived at It is archived at Think-Israel at

Return _________________________End of Story___________________________ Return